You can have a work that is created by the compilation/aggregation of
several other works, though can't you? (admittedly, I'm stepping onto shaky
ground here).
Celine
On Oct 24 2012, Amies, Paul wrote:
>In that case, what would be the "work"?!
>
>--
>Paul Amies
>Cataloguer
>UCL Library Services
>University College London
>Gower Street
>London
>WC1E 6BT
>
>Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 2204 (Internal ext: 32204)
>
>E-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Freedman, Vanessa Sent: 24 October 2012 12:27 To:
> [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of
> record 4
>
> Or are the individual chapters "expressions" and the compilation a
> "manifestation" (still can't get my head round FRBR)?
>
>Vanessa
>
>Vanessa Freedman
>Hebrew & Jewish Studies Librarian
>UCL Library Services
>University College London
>Gower Street
>London WC1E 6BT
>
>Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 2598 (Internal ext. 32598)
>Fax: +44 (0) 20 7679 7373
>E-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>Website: www.ucl.ac.uk/library<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/library>
>
>**Please remember the environment and only print this if necessary**
>
>
> From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Amies,
> Paul Sent: 24 October 2012 12:09 To:
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject:
> Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4
>
> I used "compiler", although looking now at the definition of a compiler
> that doesn't seem quite right. I think I was determined to select
> something from I.2 (associated with work) as it didn't seem right to use
> something from I.3 (associated with an expression), as surely we are at
> the level of "work" here?
>
>--
>Paul Amies
>Cataloguer
>UCL Library Services
>University College London
>Gower Street
>London
>WC1E 6BT
>
>Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 2204 (Internal ext: 32204)
>
>E-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen
> Williams Sent: 24 October 2012 12:03 To:
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject:
> Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4
>
> Looking at the notes in Debbie's record has reminded me of a good point
> to make on this record - in all the records I've looked at so far I think
> we've all made the decision to enter all 4 editors, rather than use the
> option to abridge.
>
> Also, what do people think about relationship designators here. I was
> unsure whether to use editor, or editor of compilation.
>
>Helen
>
> From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen
> Williams Sent: 24 October 2012 12:00 To:
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject:
> [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4
>
>Let's kick off discussion of record 4 before lunchtime.
>
> Did anyone else add a related work for 'In series: Principles and
> practice in records management and archives' I wasn't quite sure how to
> format this either.
>
>Helen
>
>Helen Williams
>Assistant Librarian, Bibliographic Services
>
>LSE Library Services
>The London School of Economics and Political Science
>10 Portugal Street
>London WC2A 2HD
>
>[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>020 7955 7234
>
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
>
--
Céline Carty
English Cataloguing
Cambridge University Library
Cambridge CB3 9DR
|