At present it is physically limited to 1Gb/s.
As Ewan says, we have some bandwidth concerns - and more pressing things to address.
--Ian
On 10 Sep 2012, at 20:29, Jeremy Coles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
>> Is the RAL perfsonar box 10Gig capable, and configured to allow tests at that level?
>
> In theory capable but it is capped at 1Gb/s. There are no plans to change this as far as I know for the reasons mentioned by Ewan.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
> On 10 Sep 2012, at 12:01, Christopher J. Walker wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/12 15:48, Christopher J.Walker wrote:
>>> I'm going the Tier-2 rep at the September GDB next week (September 12th)
>>> and also the Atlas federated access meeting
>>>
>>> The GDB agenda is at:
>>>
>>> https://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=155072
>>>
>>> The Atlas federated storage meeting is at:
>>> https://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=205918
>>>
>>>
>>> There are two items where I think it may be useful to know the UK
>>> status and views are:
>>>
>>> 1) Perfsonar deployment.
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell from:
>>> http://perfsonar.racf.bnl.gov:8080/exda/?page=25&cloudName=UK
>>
>> [snip list of problems]
>>>
>>>
>>> Can sites with issues have a look at this please - many of the sites are
>>> mostly there, and I suspect the problem in many cases is failing to join
>>> the GridPP group (and other sites therefore don't see you). It would be
>>> nice to look like the UK is ahead on this issue.
>>
>> And the situation has improved. Still a couple of sites with issues, but overall it's a lot greener. Thanks guys.
>>
>> One thing I did notice is that a number of sites achieve >1Gbit/s between them - but none of them to RAL. Is the RAL perfsonar box 10Gig capable, and configured to allow tests at that level?
>>
>> Chris
|