We are talking about services here, not sites. If a VO can't use your site because its VOMS doesn't publish its presence in BDII then the VOMS service should change. But is that actually the case. What do we lose if a VOMS isn't in the BDII? Accept for the ability to see it in the BDII of course.
-----Original Message-----
From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Linda Cornwall
Sent: 07 August 2012 16:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: gLite 3.1
I don't think the NGS sites are certified in EGI (yet) and I'm not sure what the plan is. John G should know.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
> Sent: 07 August 2012 16:13
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: gLite 3.1
>
>
> Both the NGS and GridPP VOMS servers run EMI-1 release of the service
> with
> plans to move to EMI-2 as soon as Robert is settled in his new role
> with
> Physics and can perform the requisite testing.
>
> The VOMS servers maintained by NGS have never, by design published to
> BDII.
> If there is a requirement to do so now, that will need to be taken into
> account in the next upgrade.
>
> Mike
>
--
Scanned by iCritical.
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|