> I think there was also a suggestion that non-responding sites may be
> named and shamed in the EGI Technical Forum (17-21 September).
I'm not sure whether 'named and shamed' is quite the right phrase. But I think there may be a request from management for information on how many sites are still deploying unsupported software, and this may result in a 'reminder'.
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|