Our posts just crossed, Chris, but, as I wrote, I've only skimmed the
article quickly, I won't have time to read it with care for probably a week
or so, so I may be doing it an injustice. More anon.
On 11 August 2012 07:26, chris Jones <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 10/08/12 19:50, David Bircumshaw wrote:
>
>> 'an inexhaustible novelty-producing process'?
>>
>
> The problem I have here, is it becomes an end of the novel, end of art
> idea. So it becomes another version of PostModernism, to which I wouldn't
> agree. I tend more so to side with Marx, here, on the question that novelty
> is always possible... but there are other concerns, of course.
>
--
David Joseph Bircumshaw
**
Website and A Chide's Alphabet
http://www.staplednapkin.org.uk
The Animal Subsides http://www.arrowheadpress.co.uk/books/animal.html
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/david.bircumshaw
twitter: http://twitter.com/bucketshave
blog: http://groggydays.blogspot.com/
Leicester Poetry Society: http://www.poetryleicester.com
|