We seem to be talking past each other, Chris.
I was speaking as a heterosexual, yes. How masculine I am, what that might
or might not mean, was not in it.
I'm not denying anything. I'm not defining anything. Just a little bit of
(I hope) useful assertion
& as to Justin Beiber, he signifies to me about as much as... Baby Spice
L
On Tue, August 7, 2012 10:48, chris Jones wrote:
> On 07/08/12 17:50, Lawrence Upton wrote:
>
>>> And to come without ejaculation
>>>
>> is not the sole preserve of gays
>
>
> but is this not meant by gay?
>
> As against what is meant by masculine heterosexual. What if Justin
> Beiber, yet another teen pop singing male star, a long line of many,
> were to kiss another boy? This meaning of gay... it has always another.
> Miss that and you will not get the logic of what gay means. Perhaps
> Justin is so gay. Too gay to be so... this is the question. (He looks in
> his face to be too feminine. Like a girl, lesbians fall for that look. He
> looks gay. See it in his face. A gay face? What does this incur?)
>
> The affective of Lacan's petit objet a?
>
>
-----
Lawrence Upton
Visiting Fellow, Music Dept,
Goldsmiths, University of London
New Cross, London SE14 6NW
----
|