On 03/08/12 01:11, Lawrence Upton wrote:
> of course, machines are really like unconscious processes
>
> not t'other way round
Always interesting to read of human computer inter-actions and
reactions. (Like a rash.)
Christopher, you have notifications pending... fb is so nice to give me
this order
As for the quoted inversion... what if I inverted it again and said;
machines are really like conscious processes. (Common sense.)
How about, from memory, Kant's conscious logic; ontologically based on bridge theory mathematics.
(Without doing a check of the literature type warning.) Hence, the unconscious is the non-sense that surrounds the common sense logic of computer code as consciousness. This logic of nonsense is, of course,far more rigorous
then that offered up by common conscious sense machine-code. (Code has a base on hardware.) Hence computers, as such, are mechanisms, rather then machines. (Hence, then the machinic unconscious is not a computer, hardware or code.)
|