JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  August 2012

PHD-DESIGN August 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Doing research with historical material (was: Cliodynamics and Design History)

From:

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:00:05 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (65 lines)

Dear Kari and Cameron,

First, Kari, my apologies for spelling your family name with too few letters.

Both these posts make good sense to me. I’m not arguing for the application of cliodynamics to design history. I was, rather, responding to the use of a cliodynamic example to say why it raised problems. In the course of the comment, I began to wonder whether one could make use of cliodynamics and what that might require. I took the example of a chair as a common designed artefact one might study – it could have been anything from a fork or a bicycle, or an object embedded in process such as a board game, or even a pure process such as the waiting line. In thinking about it, I realized that with a sufficient number of examples, one could learn something evolutionary that might yield valuable insights, much as cliodynamics promises to yield insights on human affairs.

It is the search for regularities that requires large data sets applying this method. I’m not making the case that one needs large data sets for all methods.

As Don Norman and Roberto Verganti (2012) demonstrate in their paper, a few well-chosen examples can yield valuable insights and conclusions. The principle of case study research demonstrates that on well-chosen case can be enough.

Karl Weick’s research clock metaphor is one way to explain it. The research clock has two hands with three possible positions, 12 o’clock, 4 o’clock, and 8 o’clock. These three points represent the general, the accurate, and the simple. Weick proposes that we can achieve two of these qualities in any one project, but not all three.

We can be general and accurate but not simple, accurate and simple but not general, or general and simple but not accurate. We can have accurate and simple theories if we do not insist on generality.

In seeking regularities across the historical flow of human affairs, Peter Turchin or Murray Gell-Mann seeks generality with accuracy. If cliodynamics delivers on the promise of helping us to understand the flow of history or make choices in public policy design, it will be extremely valuable even without complete predictive power (see Turchin 2008). For a researcher with the right skills, I’m speculating that cliodynamics applied well might yield valuable insights for design history. If we could draw regularities out of the design history of successful objects or processes, that would be a huge value. But one would need an appropriate data set and a rich range of methodological skills. Since I wouldn’t myself attempt to apply cliodynamics to design history, this was only a speculative thought responding to what I took as a proposal that we should use cliodynamics.

Some years ago, I heard a management professor describe his approach to understanding processes within organizations as a science of particularities. He saw organizations as ecologies, and some parts of the organizations he studied as micro-ecologies, much like the square meter of a rain forest that might be unlike any other in some respect.

What you are proposing is looking at systems closer to the single square meter of a rainforest. It will be different to any other square meter while teaching us something useful about more than itself.

At any rate, you are quite right to suggest that we can’t separate the artifacts we design from the processes in which we embed them through use. If there were to be a successful cliodynamics of design, I assume it would take use and human interaction into account. Again, though, I’m not making a case for cliodynamics in design history – I see it as useful background knowledge for people who want to understand things and how we use them even though we may not usefully know how to apply it yet.

In contrast, we can make very good use of the kinds of methods you describe, and we can use the kinds of approach that Don and Roberto take in their paper (Norman and Verganti 2012).

Apologies again, Kari, on dropping letters from your family name. And congratulations, Cameron, on your appointment as Director of Design Studies at the Carnegie Mellon University School of Design.

Warm regards,

Ken

Professor Ken Friedman, PhD, DSc (hc), FDRS | University Distinguished Professor | Dean, Faculty of Design | Swinburne University of Technology | Melbourne, Australia | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> | Ph: +61 3 9214 6078 | Faculty www.swinburne.edu.au/design<http://www.swinburne.edu.au/design>

--

References

Norman, Donald A., and Roberto Verganti. 2012. Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research versus Technology and Meaning Change.
Available at URL: http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/incremental_and_radi.html

Turchin, Peter. 2008. Turchin Peter. 2008. “Arise ‘cliodynamics’.” Nature, 454: 34-35. Available at URL: http://cliodynamics.info/

--

Kari Kuutti wrote:

—snip—

Cooking up new metaphors is notoriusly unrewarding sport, but let’s give it a try anyway. A geologist is not interested in any particular hill, lake, gorge or bay (that would be a geographer!) just because of their locality and particularity; he or she is trying to understand the formation and transformation of earth’s uppermost crust over eons of time, and these are just unnecessary details in that picture. But to get any data to ruminate upon what may have been happened, the only possibility is to return to those local and particular hills, lakes, etc., because every one of them can give a witness account of what has happened to it over the course of time. True, these accounts are partial, biased anddistorted, but by collecting enough of them, some hypothesis can be formed, and from that on any new witness is no more selected arbitrarily, but due to its capability to bring more light to issues relevant to the hypothesis under development. The end result will be an explanatory account of a transformation process, supported by a sequence of material witnesses of particular hills, lakes etc., selected because of their capability to illustrate the existence of a certain phase in the process.

Metaphorically, something similar might happen with artifacts.

Artifacts are, however, half-muted witnesses; the further (geographically and historically) they are taken from practices they are used, the more feeble is their voice, and eventually it dies down. The museums around the world are full of artifacts nobody has a clue what for and how they were once used (the weasel word forthem is “cult objects”:-)). Artifacts reveal themselves fully only in human practices, and correspondingly they should not be studied separately.

—snip—

Cameron Tonkinwise wrote

—snip—

Elizabeth Shove and Mikka Pantzar nicely call things separated from their practices ‘fossils.’ Shove, Elizabeth and Pantzar, Mika (2005) Fossilisation. Ethnologia Europaea - Journal of European Ethnology, 35 (1-2). pp. 59-63

Elizabeth speculates in her contribution to _Time Consumption and Everyday Life: Practice, Materiality and Culture_ (Berg, 2009) about “This possibility brings me to the fossilisation-innovation-transformation index (FITI), the third and final instrument in my imaginary tool-kit. Properly applied, the FITI gives a sense both of the rate at which practices are changing, and of the relativeplasticity or rigidity (lock-in) of the interlocking systems of practice ofwhich society is composed.”

—snip—

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager