Ian Tickle wrote:
> below the noise threshold. This does make the tacit assumption that
> the unmeasured reflections are distributed randomly in reciprocal
> space, which is clearly not entirely true, but it's hard to see how
> one could account for the non-random distribution. Again, in any case
>
What about collecting in the corners of a square detector?
Due to the crystal diffracting better than expected or
the need to sacrifice resolution for spot separation?
eab
|