Hi Alessandra
We (UK) are not part of LHCONE, though if I recall Glasgow were going to setup a test endpoint for it.
> The basic seems configured. I only miss the dashboard
> https://perfsonar.usatlas.bnl.gov:8443/exda/?page=25&cloudName=UK
> which after a bit more memory effort I think is Jeremy's task.
Duncan agreed to act as our contact with the dashboard maintainer. If Duncan is away then I'll send the request later this afternoon.
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 4 Jul 2012, at 11:48, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've enabled the bandwidth, latency and traceroute tests against all sites listed in GridPP and turned off the services where appropriate to avoid confusion.
>
> No UK site seems to be part of LHCONE (?) and looking at the number of sites in ATLAS and Atlas I think ATLAS is the correct one.
>
> The basic seems configured. I only miss the dashboard
>
> https://perfsonar.usatlas.bnl.gov:8443/exda/?page=25&cloudName=UK
>
> which after a bit more memory effort I think is Jeremy's task.
>
> cheers
> alessandra
>
> On 04/07/2012 09:30, Christopher J. Walker wrote:
>> On 04/07/12 09:24, Alessandra Forti wrote:
>>> ok so we stick to the generic names. I've seen other sites haven't
>>> bothered to distinguish them.
>>>
>>
>> I've added Manchester and BHAM to QMUL's tests.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>> On 04/07/2012 09:21, Christopher J. Walker wrote:
>>>> On 04/07/12 09:13, Alessandra Forti wrote:
>>>>> Do these machines have a problem with DNS aliases?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They seem to report the real hostname.
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/07/2012 17:53, Alessandra Forti wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've installed two machines in Manchester.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sv220316.tier2.hep.manchester.ac.uk (latency)
>>>>>> sv220317.tier2.hep.manchester.ac.uk (bandwidth)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I added to the following communities
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GridPP
>>>>>> ATLAS
>>>>>> Atlas (don't know the difference with the previous one)
>>>>>> LHCONE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think someone needs to add the machines here
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://perfsonar.usatlas.bnl.gov:8443/exda/?page=25&cloudName=UK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> not sure about the full configuration yet though. I'm still looking at
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>> alessandra
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 25/06/2012 14:28, Jeremy Coles wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'd also encourage everyone to get their perfsonar boxes up and
>>>>>>>> running sooner rather than later for doing the routine ongoing
>>>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>> I'd second that. In fact we do have a nominal plan for all sites to
>>>>>>> have perfsonar boxes installed by the end of July, and I'm still
>>>>>>> hoping that a few more sites will help us hit our (+4) June target
>>>>>>> (so far thanks to John at Cambridge we have one additional site
>>>>>>> (https://perfsonar.usatlas.bnl.gov:8443/exda/?page=25&cloudName=UK)
>>>>>>> in addition to QMUL, Oxford and RAL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jeremy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 25 Jun 2012, at 14:07, Ewan MacMahon wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>>>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Simon Fayer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We're looking to test our new network link here at Imperial which
>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>> be capable of up to 40Gbit/s. Are there any 10+Gbit/s connected
>>>>>>>>> sites
>>>>>>>>> which have iperf endpoints they'd be willing to let us test against?
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As a temporary setup, everyone can feel free to use ours, it's on
>>>>>>>> a 10G
>>>>>>>> link but that's shared with the rest of Oxford; we've not actually
>>>>>>>> got
>>>>>>>> more than 5.5 out of it:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> t2-10gtest.physics.ox.ac.uk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's running iperf on the default port. I'd also encourage
>>>>>>>> everyone to
>>>>>>>> get their perfsonar boxes up and running sooner rather than later for
>>>>>>>> doing the routine ongoing testing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ewan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Facts aren't facts if they come from the wrong people. (Paul Krugman)
|