On 04/07/12 09:13, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> Do these machines have a problem with DNS aliases?
>
They seem to report the real hostname.
Chris
>
> On 03/07/2012 17:53, Alessandra Forti wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've installed two machines in Manchester.
>>
>> sv220316.tier2.hep.manchester.ac.uk (latency)
>> sv220317.tier2.hep.manchester.ac.uk (bandwidth)
>>
>> I added to the following communities
>>
>> GridPP
>> ATLAS
>> Atlas (don't know the difference with the previous one)
>> LHCONE
>>
>> I think someone needs to add the machines here
>>
>> https://perfsonar.usatlas.bnl.gov:8443/exda/?page=25&cloudName=UK
>>
>> not sure about the full configuration yet though. I'm still looking at
>> it.
>>
>> cheers
>> alessandra
>>
>> On 25/06/2012 14:28, Jeremy Coles wrote:
>>>> I'd also encourage everyone to get their perfsonar boxes up and
>>>> running sooner rather than later for doing the routine ongoing testing.
>>> I'd second that. In fact we do have a nominal plan for all sites to
>>> have perfsonar boxes installed by the end of July, and I'm still
>>> hoping that a few more sites will help us hit our (+4) June target
>>> (so far thanks to John at Cambridge we have one additional site
>>> (https://perfsonar.usatlas.bnl.gov:8443/exda/?page=25&cloudName=UK)
>>> in addition to QMUL, Oxford and RAL.
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 Jun 2012, at 14:07, Ewan MacMahon wrote:
>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>>>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Simon Fayer
>>>>>
>>>>> We're looking to test our new network link here at Imperial which
>>>>> should
>>>>> be capable of up to 40Gbit/s. Are there any 10+Gbit/s connected sites
>>>>> which have iperf endpoints they'd be willing to let us test against?
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> As a temporary setup, everyone can feel free to use ours, it's on a 10G
>>>> link but that's shared with the rest of Oxford; we've not actually got
>>>> more than 5.5 out of it:
>>>>
>>>> t2-10gtest.physics.ox.ac.uk
>>>>
>>>> It's running iperf on the default port. I'd also encourage everyone to
>>>> get their perfsonar boxes up and running sooner rather than later for
>>>> doing the routine ongoing testing.
>>>>
>>>> Ewan
>>
>>
>
>
|