Sure, it was even on the storage group's list of things to look at -
it's just that there's historically been more interest in Storm than
Bestman in Europe, so the balance of things goes Storm's way
(especially re conformance).
Sam
On 17 July 2012 15:00, Stuart Wakefield <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I think Simon said it was fairly easy to install a simple bestman
> instance once the filesystem was there.
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Sam Skipsey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> hi Matt,
>>
>> As far as I am aware, no-one has done a Bestman/Lustre install
>> (certainly not in production, or in the UK).
>>
>> The most experienced Storm/Lustre wrangler is, of course, Chris
>> Walker, who I'm sure will be along any second now with tips.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On 17 July 2012 14:12, Matthew Viljoen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As part of the Tier 1 evaluation of alternative disk-only storage
>>> solutions, I have setup a mini 100TB Lustre service. I would now like to
>>> set up Storm/Bestman in front of it to test it alongside other solutions.
>>>
>>> If anyone can provide me with pointers to documentation how they have
>>> deployed Storm/Bestman with Lustre, I will be grateful.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Scanned by iCritical.
>>
|