Sorry I wasn't clear: use omatrix1 (without the target3 argument).
This option will give you a matrix that is seedXseed.
You will still need to process it further to reduce it to NxN by combining the appropriate seed coordinates that belong to the same ROIs.
Saad
On 16 Jul 2012, at 12:55, Rosalia Dacosta wrote:
> Ok,
>
> So, if I have understood you well:
>
> It would be better, with a N of (85) (matrix of 85x85) use the following optional arguments: --omatrix1 (instead of omatrix3 or --os2t) and --target3 as optional arguments?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rosalia.
--
Saad Jbabdi
University of Oxford, FMRIB Centre
JR Hospital, Headington, OX3 9DU, UK
(+44)1865-222466 (fax 717)
www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~saad
|