On 7/15/12 5:46 AM, Pete Johnston wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 14 July 2012 20:46, Richard Urban <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> The other culprit is OAI-DC model, which is not DCAM compliant IMHO.
>
> oai_dc preceded the DCAM by several years so it wasn't created with
> the DCAM in mind, but FWIW I had a stab at formulating a
> DCAM/DSP-based account of "Simple Dublin Core" and oai_dc here
>
> http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2009/10/what-is-simple-dublin-core.html
OMG Pete -- this is the clearest description of the difference between
the DC15 and DCMES that I have ever seen. Brilliant. We MUST put a
version of this on the DCMI web site because EVERYONE needs to read it.
Really. Even without the document from the DCMES view, this is invaluable.
kc
>
> See also
>
> http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2009/11/simple-dc-revisited.html
>
> (I never did finish the promised "Qualified DC" post as I ended up
> trying to encompass so many different interpretations of what people
> thought that term meant that it seemed a bit pointless!)
>
> Pete
>
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
|