Yes, so in particular look in the Experiments --> Experiments dialog in
the Experiment Types tab, and then click on the relevant (NH-HSQC-TOCSY)
experiment in the table at the top, and then check the onebond
relationship in the table at the bottom left. It could be that the wrong
H is bound to the N.
Wayne
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Pernille Møller wrote:
> Thanks, David.
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 07:03:30 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Correlated dims
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Hey,
>
> If it is what it sounds like, I would be worried. Correlated dims really prevents you from making a
> lot of mistakes and really cleans up the peak list that you can choose from when assigning your
> resonances. It may not seem like a big deal at the start, but it will become one.
>
> If the problem is that you know a peak is correlated, but Analysis does not think that it is
> correlated, the problem probably lies in the 'experiment type' which you have selected for your
> various experiments. Take a good look there and make sure that is set properly.
>
> Take care,
>
> David
>
>
> On 7/1/2012 5:07 AM, Pernille Møller wrote:
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> Well, I have a question about ”Correlated dims”. I have assigned a peak in my NH HSQC
> spectrum and said same spin system. Next, when I want to assign peaks with same amide
> resonances in my 3D NH-HSQC-TOCSY I can’t choose my amide resonances for N and H. This can
> only be done if I remove the mark in Correlated dims? I have removed this mark to pick
> these resonances for several peaks now, but what causes the problem? Should I be worried?
>
>
>
> /Pernille
>
>
>
>
>
|