On 7 Jun 2012, at 12:42, James JJ Hooper wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IPv6 - Next Generation Internet Protocol [mailto:IPV6-
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rob Evans
>> Sent: 07 June 2012 12:10
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: IPv6 Launch
>>
>>> More updates from Google: they insist their breakage stats are
>> good, and if they are reporting errors then errors are occurring.
>> They seem extremely reluctant to give me any "in" on how they are
>> generating their stats.
>>>
>>> Is anyone from JANET on the list? Is there any chance at all
>> there is some kind of network-layer problem, such as sporadic
>> loss? I note that, of all UK sites on the no_aaaa blacklist, all
>> but one are AS786. This seems extremely suspect...
>>
>> Yes, I am (and maybe others). I'm not aware of any such problems
>> and whilst I'm no longer in Ops and so don't see the tickets, I
>> would usually have heard some discussion if problems had been
>> reported.
>>
>> Are there any sites that have some sort of IPv6 deployment that do
>> not have their resolvers on the Google blacklist (i.e. are working
>> fine)?
>
> Bristol are not on the blacklist, but as our IPv6 deployment seems smaller
> than those that are, it makes sense that our brokenness per resolver IP
> would be much lower.
>
> Presumably those who are blacklisted are "handling" [dropping] 6to4 / teredo
> etc at their edge and so it couldn't be clients trying those that are
> providing the brokenness?
Only 2 of our 3 DNS Servers are blacklisted.
Scott Armitage
|