> -----Original Message-----
> From: IPv6 - Next Generation Internet Protocol [mailto:IPV6-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rob Evans
> Sent: 07 June 2012 12:10
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Launch
>
> > More updates from Google: they insist their breakage stats are
> good, and if they are reporting errors then errors are occurring.
> They seem extremely reluctant to give me any "in" on how they are
> generating their stats.
> >
> > Is anyone from JANET on the list? Is there any chance at all
> there is some kind of network-layer problem, such as sporadic
> loss? I note that, of all UK sites on the no_aaaa blacklist, all
> but one are AS786. This seems extremely suspect...
>
> Yes, I am (and maybe others). I'm not aware of any such problems
> and whilst I'm no longer in Ops and so don't see the tickets, I
> would usually have heard some discussion if problems had been
> reported.
>
> Are there any sites that have some sort of IPv6 deployment that do
> not have their resolvers on the Google blacklist (i.e. are working
> fine)?
Bristol are not on the blacklist, but as our IPv6 deployment seems smaller
than those that are, it makes sense that our brokenness per resolver IP
would be much lower.
Presumably those who are blacklisted are "handling" [dropping] 6to4 / teredo
etc at their edge and so it couldn't be clients trying those that are
providing the brokenness?
-James
|