The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  June 2012

DISABILITY-RESEARCH June 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: The role of disabled people within disability research: a few QUESTIONS

From:

Tsitsi Chataika <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tsitsi Chataika <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:57:01 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (254 lines)

Dear Colleauges

I agree with Kudzai. At times we unconciously use the term disability
in place of impairment; unfortunately, this causes confusion to the
disability studies discourse, as well as to policy makers, who are
also struggling (if at all), to understand disability debates. The
issue of limited opportunities for disabled people is a lived reality
as Kudzai has indicated. Unless we all come together as disability
researchers, disability activists and all other allies; and challenge
the statusquo, it will be take a century, if not more to level the
playing field.

In terms of research; I have always argued that doing disability
research without the people that experience the researched phenomenon
is unacceptable. Hence, as researchers, disabled people should be
partners in research; not just backyard partners, but  a 'marriage of
commitment' should be fostered. This also includes conducting research
that is meant to benefit global south citizens. We cannot continue to
engage in the colonial mentality where research is only dictacted by
those from the North. Unfortunately, I have seen many research bids
where the funder categorically indicates that that the principal
investigator has to be residing in either UK or USA, and this makes me
ask: "Can we not get principal investigators from the global south?"
Personally, I have conducted some disability studies, with high impact
as I clearly understand why research is important to change policy
environments in Africa, but at the same time, not undermining her
indegineous knowledge systems. I have always questioned reseachers who
do not measure the tangible impact of their research - particularly
within marginalised communities. The impact can always be measured by
the intended beneficiaries when they are also partners in this
exercise. I have practical examples of the A-PODD project that saw me
working with DPOs in Uganda and Sierra Leone and how, as a critical
mass, we managed to  influence the policy environent, particularly in
Uganda when disability issues were included the country's National
Development Plan after our intervention. This is only possible when
researchers not only go to research environments to collect data and
establish their names through publications, and get professorships;
but when they intervene in changing policy environments as they
conduct their studies. So, the take home message is:

"Never leave the researched environment the same way you found it when
you first entred".

Kudzai, we will continue the stuggle for a better Zimbabwe together,
lets join hands and make our country the place we want it to be! By
the way; this year's theme of the Day of the African Child on the 16th
June is 'Children with disabilities" - We are planning a national
television programme in Zimbabwe that broadcasted. So, other fellow
Africans and genuine Global North partners, lets do something to
promote the disabled African child on the 16th June in partnership
with disabled people. Together we will make this world a better place
to live.

Tsitsi Chataika

On 09/06/2012, Gordon C. Cardona <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I feel I must thank all of you have replied me on the list or via my
> personal email. All your comments proved useful in addressing my concerns
> and to re-think my own position within disability research in the various
> roles I have played - research subject and, later, that of researcher. In
> some way, this has made me aware of the problems that both roles present to
> us as individuals. For, inasmuch as we try, we can never fully detach
> ourselves from our position within a particular context.
>
> However, I think that the role of disabled people within the research
> process, especially within emancipatory research, remains central. Indeed,
> ideally disabled people should not only participate and be involved in the
> process of research but actually be conducting the research themselves. Yet,
> as some of you pointed out, this is not free from its dilemmas. For how I
> define myself as a disabled person will vary from another disabled person
> who wishes to be defined as "normal"? In this sense, must the disabled
> person define him/herself in a particular political language to be truly
> 'disabled' or representative of disabled people?
>
> As a researcher, there is the danger that, even if you identify yourself as
> 'disabled by society', you run the risk of downplaying the views of those
> also defined by society as 'disabled' but who don't look at their situation
> in such terms. There is also the danger that by representing the voices of
> disabled people, researchers may take it onto themselves to become  the
> defenders of disabled people to the extent that they even perceive disabled
> activists who dare speak for themselves as a threat to their status or
> position. It's like a 'holier than thou' attitude you find amongst some
> 'religious' types. Once again, by taking over the role of spokesperson for
> the cause of disabled people, a researcher may in fact become, as Larry
> would term it, a "colonizer". And the risk of presuming that you are right
> and the only true voice of disabled people becomes greater if you are a
> disabled person with visible impairments.
>
> However, I find a certain resolution to counter the risks posed by the
> relationship between disability research/researcher. And that is to ensure
> that you take care to let go of the need to be the centre of the research
> process but serve instead of a mediator, or translator, and sincerely
> attempt to represent the voices of those who you are claiming to represent.
> As I read from other papers on the subject of emancipatory disability
> research, such research is not meant to be a project that ends there.
> Rather, it's a process and, indeed, the 'project' might be only the first
> step to achieve the transformational power of emancipatory research.
>
> While we cannot severe ourselves from our background or roots as researcher
> - whether we identify as disabled or not - our role should be, I think,
> twofold.
>
> On the one hand, we must strive to present the voices of disabled people in
> a way that is in conformity with the practice within sociological research.
>
> On the other, we must keep in mind that any commitment we might have to the
> cause of the disability movement cannot come before the actual and reality
> that is expressed by disabled participants .
>
> In this sense, I feel that if I continue contributing to disability activism
> and as a researcher, I need to let go of the need to usurp the voices of
> disabled people who I seek to represent, but rather take this as an
> opportunity to further empower other disabled people and encourage other
> disabled people to find value in their life and to enjoy a better quality of
> life. That is, I believe what emancipation is all about. That is, I think,
> what disability activism should be all about.
>
> Best,
> Gordon
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gordon C. Cardona
> BA Hon. (Malta), MA (Leeds)
> ---------------------------
> Contact Info
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Web: http://www.gordongd.com/
> Join me on Twitter @ http://twitter.com/#!/GordonGT
> Join me on FaceBook @http://www.facebook.com/gordongt
>
>  “If you want to be happy, practice compassion.
> If you want others to be happy, practice compassion”
> 	HH The 14th Dalai Lama (6 July 1935 - present)
>
> On 01 Jun 2012, at 16:49, Gordon C. Cardona wrote:
> Dear all,
> When I became involved in disability research, I wasn’t unsure of what I was
> getting involved in. I have met a lot of people from various fields of life,
> some of which were academics or professionals. While I don’t claim to be an
> “experienced academic” in the field of disability studies, I felt a certain
> unease to realise that the vast majority, with few notable exceptions, were
> non-disabled.
>
> While, there’s no denying that there has been a lot of valuable and useful
> research conducted by non-disabled people researchers who practice the
> objectives of conducting emancipatory disability that yields practical
> improvements in our life as disabled people, the lack of disabled
> researchers is, indeed, anomalous. Granted, this may be simply my perception
> but, unfortunately, those people who should “own” this research and,
> ideally, conduct it themselves remain absent from much of  the research
> process.
>
> This prompts me to ask why disabled people as researchers is fairly limited
> and, unlike other disciplines such as feminist studies, the group of
> interest is in the minority and has, in effect, little or no clear control.
> Here, I am not denying that efforts are being made to increase the number of
> disabled academics engaging in emancipatory and related disability research.
> I know, because I have benefited from such an opportunity with the
> University of Leeds.
>
> Yet, I beg the questions:
>
>  To what extent does disability research which purports to be “emancipatory”
> can end up being a source of further oppression and alienation of disabled
> people?
>
> To what extent dubious research can enforce negative attitudes or
> stereotypes?
>
> To what extent does disability research conducted by non-disabled people
> actually representing the views of disabled participants who are took part
> in the research?
>
> How far can disability research go until it becomes exploitative rather than
> empowering?
>
> Why are  disabled people largely absent (it seems) from actual involvement
> in disability research and emancipatory disability research in particular?
>
> And, perhaps the most controversial question:
>
> Can we have disability research without the active involvement of disabled
> people throughout the research process (not just in the data collection
> phase)?
>
> I am putting these questions out there because as I’m currently going
> through compiling a report we conducted locally, I find myself asking
> whether I may be, indeed ‘hijacking’ the voices of participants in the
> process of interpreting the data. And, even if I’m a disabled person myself,
> whether I risk imposing my own values about disability and my identity as a
> disabled person within the interpretation of results.
>
>  Hope to read your comments/opinions.
>
> Best,
> Gordon
> Gordon C. Cardona
> BA Hon. (Malta), MA (Leeds)
> ---------------------------
> Contact Info
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Web: http://www.gordongd.com/
> Join me on Twitter @ http://twitter.com/#!/GordonGT
> Join me on FaceBook @http://www.facebook.com/gordongt
>
>  “If you want to be happy, practice compassion.
> If you want others to be happy, practice compassion”
> 	HH The 14th Dalai Lama (6 July 1935 - present)
>
>
> ________________End of message________________
>
> This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for
> Disability Studies at the University of Leeds
> (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
>
> Enquiries about list administration should be sent to
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Archives and tools are located at:
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.
>


-- 
Dr Tsitsi Chataika
Lecturer, Department of Educational Foundations
University of Zimbabwe
Faculty of Education
P.O. Box MP167, Mt Pleasant
Harare, Zimbabwe
 Cell:   +263 774 429 687

*Quote: It is not enough to be busy; so are the ants. The question is: what
are we busy about? - Henry David Thorea*

________________End of message________________

This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).

Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]

Archives and tools are located at: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager