out of interest what errors are we talking about? errors while developing a workflow or errors while running? im guessing the latter but the former is a problem too.



Alun

________________________________
From: Main mail list for the dawn collaboration [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Olof Svensson [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 12 June 2012 15:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [DAWN] DAWN / Passerelle workflow error handling video conference on Thursday June 21st at 15:00 CET

Hi again,

As there were very few people signing up for the VC I delayed the decision for the date/time till today. The VC will take place on

  *   Thursday June 21st at 15:00 CET (14:00 UK)

If you do would like to participate but this date/time is not possible for you please let me know asap. I'll send out later the EVO booking.

Regards,

Olof



On 06/08/2012 09:03 AM, Olof Svensson wrote:
Hi everybody,

Sandor and myself suggest to meet in a video conference and discuss workflow error handling in Passerelle / DAWN. We are at the ESRF coming close to deploy workflow on beamlines for users and one of the weakest points in these workflows is error handling. We would therefore like to discuss the following topics with you in a (EVO) video conference:

  *   Experience of error handling from Isencia / Soleil

  *   Improvements of error handling in the DAWN / Passerelle RCP workflow implementation

If you would like to participate in this video conference please fill in your availability in the following poll before noon on Monday June 11th:

http://www.doodle.com/sr4fgxvnfw9vt868

I'll send you the date/time of the video conference on Monday afternoon.

Regards,

Olof