Hello,
We could add the ability to have peaks that are selected in the Peak
Table (in the Peak --> Peak Lists dialog) (is this the table you mean?)
and make them selected in the spectrum windows (so with a box around
them). But in general you wouldn't be able to see then all, which might
be a bit disconcerting. But is the reason you want this so that you can
then unite the resonances for these peaks? If so it might be better just
to put a "unite" (or "align") option in the Peak Table in the first place.
Wayne
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Seuring Carolin wrote:
> Hey Wayne, thanks. I know I am bothering...
> But concerning :
>
> "Tim says this should be possible (i.e. to unite on all the selected
> peaks), if nobody else objects (it would warn you if you have selected
> more than one)."
>
> I feel this is not so much the answer to the question. Sorry for my bad
> description. What you say is perfectly true, if I click on the peaks by
> hand in the spectrum. I have like 800 peaks in the spectrum, so it's
> really hard to select them by hand! Can I do that as I tried to describe
> below... somehow from the peakslist menu? That would be favorable as I
> can see all the peaks directly and don't have to search through the
> spectrum. So my question is... instead of marking the peaks from this
> peaklist "MARK SELECTED" is there a way to directly "ACTIVATE THEM" (so
> that all marked peaks have a square)? I guess, I am not very clear in
> describing... do you understand what I try to say?
>
> Carolin
>
>
>
> On Jun 6, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Wayne Boucher wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Some answers below.
>>
>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Seuring Carolin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Wayne,
>>> thank you as well for the details... I am happy with the "unify peaks" option.
>>> still I have 2 more questions.
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently I have around 20 spectra in the project, if I want to align the peaks in 1 of them, I would set this to 1 and all others to 0.1. Or is there a difference between a 10 : 1 ratio and a 1 : 0.1 ratio?
>>>
>>
>> 10:1 is the same as 1:0.1, so it's just the relative scale that matters. (And obviously the spectra with less overlap and better resolution should have a higher weight.)
>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I was rather wondering if there is an option in the resonance table that can "activate the peaks". For example, currently in e.g. the peaklist one can click on a peak and say "Mark selected", so two lines appear and cross at the peak position. I think for the "unify resonance option" it would be great to have an option that (1) you select a bunch of peaks of 1 atom in the same amino acid (e.g. 6 ProCa), then (2) you can say "activate the peaks" (they all get a square around the cross and are RMM active) in the spectrum, (3) you go back to the spectrum and say RMM:Assign:Unify peaks. Since this is much easier than going through the spectrum and selecting all the peaks of interest by hand. Is there already a way to do that?
>>>
>>
>> Tim says this should be possible (i.e. to unite on all the selected peaks), if nobody else objects (it would warn you if you have selected more than one).
>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> That works well actually. But also... in solid-state spectra there are tiny shifts between spectra as you cannot 100% control the temperature. So one needs to center them or go through and check. Anyhow, I really like this option, too. In the combination with unify resonances its even better!
>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Wayne
>
|