Thanks to you both, & to Andrew.
It's part of what I try for...
Doug
On 2012-05-16, at 11:55 PM, Stephen Vincent wrote:
> I agree, Shelia.
> Stephen
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wed, May 16, 2012 9:02:56 PM
> Subject: Doug's piece
>
> to layer one colour
>> so subtly to tones
>> slightest changes
>>
>> a melody of slightest shifts
>> shifts the mind
>> to smallest alter
>> ration all that
>>
>> monochrome never
>> quite there
>
>
> Doug, this is very fine, and suble in its observations. the words have
> motion and dance so deliberately and delicately. Thank you.
>
> sheila
>
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
http://eclecticruckus.wordpress.com/
Latest books:
Continuations & Continuations 2 (with Sheila E Murphy)
http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=962
Wednesdays'
http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
The postliterate sensibility is offended by anything that isn’t television, views with suspicion the compound sentence, the subordinate clause, words of more than three syllables. The home and studio audiences become accustomed to hearing voices swept clean of improvised literary devices, downsized into data points, degraded into industrial-waste product.
Lewis Lapham
|