The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  May 2012

DISABILITY-RESEARCH May 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies: CFP

From:

"Dr. David Bolt" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Dr. David Bolt

Date:

Wed, 23 May 2012 13:31:35 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (126 lines)

Disability, Media, and Technology
Call for Papers for a Special Issue of the Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies

Guest editors: 
Alan Foley and Stephen A. Kuusisto, Syracuse University. Syracuse, NY USA.

 

Deadlines

1 Sept 2012: Deadline for proposals

1 Oct 2012: Manuscript finalists will be informed

1 March 2013: Manuscript deadline

30 May 2013: Reviewer feedback and editorial decisions

Estimated publication: 2014

Summary
In this call, we seek articles that explore the cultural, social, and practical issues found at the nexus of disability, media, and technology. We encourage a variety of paper formats including empirical analysis, policy review and discussion. We welcome papers that are multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary in nature and that engage with the complexity and rapidly changing nature of technology. 

Media and Technology
We take a holistic view of technology. There are multiple “layers” of meaning of the word “technology” (MacKenzie and Wajcman) and these layers should be considered in an integral manner. There are the actual physical components - computers, mobile devices, or assistive technologies.  There are the procedures, activities, or organizational systems that incorporate these components. These may be such things as user manuals, or online protocols, but may also be manifested also in daily habits of users of the technologies. Finally, there is the technical knowledge that enables particular activities, the accumulation of knowledge that makes a practice possible. The lines between these layers are not sharp: devices can reify procedures; organizations are mutually constituted by their artifacts; and activities can be viewed as both knowledge and practices. 

 

Detail

Telecommunications has an ongoing, critical role in the exercise of power and governance within postmodern society (Goggin and Newell 39). 

Information is precisely the system of control (Deleuze).

The potential of technology to connect people and provide access to education, commerce, employment, and entertainment has never been greater or more rapidly changing. Communication technologies and new media promise to “revolutionize our lives” by breaking down barriers (Goggin and Newell xiii) and opening up worlds for disabled people (Ellis and Kent 2). Technology is often characterized as liberating - making up for social, educational, and physical barriers to full-participation in society. Particularly for people with disabilities, technology has been seen as a futuristic antidote for impairment. Through the wonders of technology, disability simply fades away or becomes inconsequential. Utopian fantasies about technology promise that “limitations can be transcended, and new freedoms found… [for] people with disabilities, [who are seen as] special beneficiaries” of technology (Goggin and Newell 110). Of course, we must point out a certain contradiction in putting ones faith in science to resolve or ameliorate the very problems that were created or constructed by science in the first place. 

Yet, discourse on technology in relation to disability often focuses on the potential of assistive technology to replace human supports and promote greater independence. Certainly there is libratory potential, but some disability is socially created and the same social prejudices are often simply “reproduced in the digital world” (Ellis and Kent  2).  That is, technology, like all of science, is inside culture - not separate from it.

The Problematic of [Assistive] Technology
Too often, discourse on technology in relation to disability often focuses on the potential of assistive technology to replace human supports and allow greater independence. Thus, technology that is disability focused or designed for disabled people is often “conceptualized as a form of ‘care’…administering to the biomedical/functional/normalizing needs of disabled bodies as commonly defined by service providers…and rehabilitative experts” (Campbell 52). These practices are grounded in normative, social, cultural, and economic practices, and, further reified in the design, manufacture, marketing, and implementation of technology. Many of the questions in which we are interested are not so much technological, but ideological. This is not to say there is no potential for “liberation” in technological advancements, but we cannot ignore ways that technology can and often does replicate many of the same social exclusions and normative thinking operating in the rest of society. As Ellis and Kent argue, we must address the “dangerous trend in digital design where socially constructed features from the analog world are migrated to the digital environment” (39). Disability focused technologies are “conceptualized as a form of ‘care’…susceptible to administering to the biomedical/functional/normalizing needs of disabled bodies as commonly defined by service providers, designers, retailers, and rehabilitative experts (52).  In this conception, often the goal is “anti-dependency” and assimilation (53). All technologies – including disability focused ones - require maintenance. This fact of maintenance creates its own burden and can take on a life of their own - a fact that is often downplayed/ignored (Campbell).

In his essay Postscript on Control Societies, Gilles Deleuze introduces the notion of the control society - in which control is operative rather than power (i.e. Foucault’s disciplinary societies). Deleuze notes, “information is precisely the system of control.” Deleuze’s Postscript has been widely used as a lens for analyzing the Internet because of its clear applications to the form and function of the Internet.  Flexibility is one of the core political principles of informatic control, described by Deleuze in his theorization of “control society.” This can been seen in the notion of distributed networks (like the Internet) which prize flexibility as a strategy for avoiding technical failure at the system level. In the context of disability, a defining concept of technology “designed” for disabled people is flexibility (e.g. in meeting technical, medical, or rehabilitative standards). Galloway notes that flexibility is a predicate of informatic control – a fundamental feature of Deleuze’s control society. We are interested in papers that explore some of the ways that technology creates unexpected and under-critiqued forms of control and exclusion of disabled people. 

With these issues in mind, we seek essays that explore the paradoxical and contradictory intersection of disability and technology and that examine technology as a cultural practice grounded in normative, social, cultural, and economic practices, and, further reified in the design, manufacture, and marketing of technology which include (but are not limited to) the following:

Cultural analyses of technology and disability
Representations of disability and technology
Pedagogy, inclusive design and digital education
 

We are interested in articles that focus on these multifaceted meanings of media and technology and explore their relationship with disability.  Our consideration of media technology includes, but is not limited to: 

The Internet
“Cloud” based technologies
Games 
Mobile technologies
Assistive technologies 
Social networks
 

Works Cited

 

Campbell, Fiona Kumari. Contours of Ableism : The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Print.

Deleuze, G. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” October 59 (1992): 3-7. Print.

Ellis, Katie, and Mike Kent. Disability and New Media. Routledge Studies in New Media and Cyberculture. New York: Routledge, 2011. Print.

Galloway, Alexander R. Gaming : Essays on Algorithmic Culture. Electronic Mediations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006. Print.

Goggin, Gerard, and Christopher Newell. Digital Disability : The Social Construction of Disability in New Media. Critical Media Studies. Lanham, UK: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003. Print.

MacKenzie, Donald A., and Judy Wajcman. The Social Shaping of Technology. 2nd ed. Buckingham [Eng.] ; Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1999. Print.

 

 

All proposals should be sent to the guest editors:

Alan Foley ([log in to unmask])

Stephen A. Kuusisto ([log in to unmask])


 
 
 
Dr. David Bolt
 
Director, Centre for Culture & Disability Studies
ccds.hope.ac.uk
 
Editor, Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies
http://JLCDS.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk
 
Lecturer, Education and Disability Studies
http://www.hope.ac.uk/boltd
 
Founder, International Network of Literary & Cultural Disability Scholars
http://www.facebook.com/pages/International-Network-of-Literary-and-Cultural-Disability-Scholars/174137315933446
http://twitter.com/#!/INLCDS
 
Email: [log in to unmask]
 
Telephone: 0151 291 3346
 
Office: EDEN 128
 
Postal address: Graduate School, Faculty of Education, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, L16 9JD.
 
Coming soon: The Madwoman and The Blindman: Jane Eyre, Discourse, Disability, edited by David Bolt, Julia Miele Rodas, and Elizabeth J. Donaldson
http://www.ohiostatepress.org/books/book%20pages/bolt%20madwoman.html

________________End of message________________

This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).

Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]

Archives and tools are located at: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager