Gosh I misread that as Christ's post-but thank you dear L
-----Original Message-----
From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Lawrence Upton
Sent: 30 April 2012 11:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: what if...
thinking about Chris's post
L
On Mon, April 30, 2012 11:51, Patrick McManus wrote:
> L What sort of thinking?
> P puzzled
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Lawrence Upton
> Sent: 30 April 2012 09:02
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: what if...
>
>
> Just to acknowledge this
>
>
> I took a day out from the internet yesterday
>
>
> --- thinking ---
>
>
> L
>
>
> On Sun, April 29, 2012 08:10, Chris Jones wrote:
>
>> On 28/04/12 16:49, Lawrence Upton wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I wasn't asked to, but I couldn't follow them, too many conflicting
>>> ideas about civil war;
>>
>>
>> The other concern that comes to me is, again Roland Barthes. Thanks
>> again for the comments, most welcome.
>>
>> Is the conflicting lines on civil war readerly or writerly? The
>> difference is is important, to me at least.
>>
>> A writerly writing is a type of writing in which the reader is free
>> to write again that which is written. A readerly writing is a
>> didactic authority imposed on the reader by the writer. (Hence,
>> Barthes idea of the death of the author...)
>>
>> What authority does a writer have? An ethical question, perhaps, as
>> much a political question.
>>
>> I suspect and might even fear that Barthes death of the author is
>> poorly understood.
>>
>> The line on civil war .... confusing, perhaps? Is the writer
>> attempting a claim of authority which is imposed on the reader? If
>> so, it is readerly and as such It allows no freedom for the reader to
>> make a writerly reading, or to re-write in a free fashion what the
>> writer has already written. (This is a question I make of my own
>> writing. It seems somewhat unfair to impose this on other writers in
>> the way I may impose it on my writing.)
>>
>> Free indirect discourse, as Barthes understands, seems to me a way to
>> write in a writerly way. That is in a way in which the reader writes
>> what is written, without making a claim by the writer to the
>> authority of being an author.
>>
>
>
> -----
> Lawrence Upton
> Visiting Fellow, Music Dept,
> Goldsmiths, University of London
> New Cross, London SE14 6NW
> ----
>
>
-----
Lawrence Upton
Visiting Fellow, Music Dept,
Goldsmiths, University of London
New Cross, London SE14 6NW
----
|