Hi Keith.
It's great that someone is saying this in public (other than myself).
However, you are only halfway there!
The primary mistake is (as you point out) the confusion between the terms "handicap" (i.e. "hand i' cap" or "hand in cap") and "cap in hand".
"Handicapping" refers to attempting to equalise the chances in horseracing; the horse deemed superior carries the greatest handicap, i.e. carries the most weight.
However, the secondary mistake is that the term "cap in hand" has nothing whatever to do with begging either.
To go to someone "cap in hand" is to show deference, to acknowledge one's social inferiority to the other person with no implication of asking for money or anything else. The commoner doffs his cap to the noble. The noble doffs his cap to the monarch.
I think there is confusion with the term "passing the hat" although strictly speaking this refers not to straightforward begging but to soliciting payment for an impromptu performance (originally collecting money for charitable purposes, similar to passing the collection plate in church or having a "whip-round" in the office).
As an autistic person I find nothing offensive in the term "handicapped". I have deliberately used the word on occasion just to annoy the politically correct. I feel perfectly justified in saying something like "I feel handicapped by my social ineptness". This is accurate. I feel that I struggle (as an animal burdened by weights will struggle) when others experience no such struggle.
"Disabled", on the other hand, does not connote struggle, quite the opposite.
If one disables a machine (most commonly one "disables an alarm system") then the machine is entirely inoperative, kaput. It has ceased to struggle.
I'm not too thrilled with the term "impairment" either.
On a related theme;
We are prohibited by political correctness from using the word "cripple" as a noun but we continue to use it as a verb or adjectivally (most commonly in "crippling pain").
Some disabled people are attempting to reclaim the word in the way that American Negros have reclaimed the word "nigger" and homosexuals have reclaimed the word "queer".
Misguided - not all disabled people are "cripples".
If I'm referred to me as a "crip" then I might be moved to put a spoke in someone's wheel.
I couldn't give a flying one for political correctness.
Accuracy is all.
Imprecise language leads to lack of clarity of thought.
Russell.
-----Original Message-----
From: The Disability-Research Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Keith Armstrong
Sent: 05 April 2012 22:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: The word 'handicap'.
Returning to William Bromwichs' text 'The handcycle corpus' in Discourse, Identities and Roles in Specialized Communication, Bromwich wrote:
'... dating back to medieval times, we may speak of an exclusionary response in which people with impaired mobility were labelled as "cripples", to be kept outside the city gates and relegated to marginal locations, such as Cripplegate in London, or Bettlerkreuz in the german-speaking states where, cap in hand, they relied on charity.' p. 255 Bettlerkreuz translates as beggar cross.
One of the mistakes those new to Disability Studies often make is that the word "Handicap" is derived from begging, as in "cap in hand", (I have even heard this argument used by so-called Disability Awareness trainers). This is not true. Whilst the words "lame" and "cripple" have an Anglo-Saxon origin, the word "handicap" comes to us from the Medieval period and only in reference to games or sport. The 17th Century diarist Samuel Pepys enjoyed a game of Handicap.
The word "Handicap" in connection to people with impairments can only be traced back to the beginnings of the 20th Century and then derived from a sense of disadvantage, in the sense of inequalities of race or gender, in horse racing and the game of golf. And even then it has no historical association with begging.
Many beggars in the past did not have impairments. A simple search in Wikipedia will reveal that the term mendicant (from Latin: mendicans, "begging") refers to begging or relying on charitable donations, and is most widely used for religious followers or ascetics who rely exclusively on charity to survive. In principle, mendicant orders or followers do not own property, either individually or collectively, and have taken a vow of poverty, in order that all their time and energy could be expended on practising or preaching their religion or way of life and serving the poor. Many religious orders adhere to a mendicant way of life, including the Catholic mendicant orders, Hindu ascetics, some dervishes of Sufi Islam, and the monastic orders of Jainism and Buddhism.
It is also stereotypical to make the assumption that even in ancient times all people with physical impairments were beggars. Many people with physical impairments were metal workers highly praised in ancient times. In fact most of the ancient gods who primarily worked in metal were also depicted as having physical impairments including Ptah (Egyptian), Hephaistos (Greek), Vulcan (Roman), Wayland Smithy (Nordic) as well as the Celtic Gods in Ireland and Wales are all described as having some sort of physical impairment in their story.
________________End of message________________
This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]
Archives and tools are located at: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.
________________End of message________________
This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]
Archives and tools are located at: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.
|