On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> > I see these constraints as being
> >defined under open-world assumptions, though I guess they could easily used
> >as closed-world constraints... (For those who know Pellett: Does this fit
> >with the Pellett idea?)
>
> Yes in general, no in particular. That one axiom is indeed not really
> dependent on OWA, I think: as soon as you've got two prefLabels with a same
> language tag, the graph is inconsistent. Considering that you may have data
> somewhere else, or in the future, wouldn't change anything.
Point taken!
> >>>Agreed. However, it is perhaps useful to contrast "open-" and
> >>>"closed-world" constraints.
> >>
> >>It is, yes!
> >
> >Is it black-and-white, or are there shades of grey?
>
> The latter, as always ;-) And I'd be reluctant to discuss the shades of grey
> here, right as the RDF group is discussing Named Graphs. Let's just gather
> the DCMI cases first, and fire them at whatever draft or spec the RDF group
> has then!
+1
Tom
--
Tom Baker <[log in to unmask]>
|