Reply-To: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 2 Apr 2012 14:01:39 -0500373_UTF-8 That's very sad, but a good point. I may be a bit naive because I haven't had to worry mas uch about direct competition.
However, I do find it very frustrating as a reviewer to try to pass judgement on a crystal structure based only on the standard table 1. Sometimes I'm tempted to write "based on the information presented, darned if I know!" [...][log in to unmask] |