Hi Stafaan
Yes, you're right there is nothing on the website - I will try and do something about this next week.
The aim is for something about Easter time I think but I'm sure others will correct me if I'm wrong. It is just undergoing a bit more testing.
Regards
Fiona
-----Original Message-----
From: WebPA [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stefaan Vanbillemont
Sent: 21 March 2012 08:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: WebPA - justification text
Hello all,
Is there a roadmap/time schedule available for the new WebPA 2.0 release?
I can't find it on the WebPA website.
Kind Regards,
Stefaan Vanbillemont
University Colleghe Ghent
Ghent - Belgium
http://www.hogent.be
Op 2/02/12 14:22, Neil Gordon schreef:
> Hi all
>
> This list is the main way to announce updates etc.
> We have some WebPA Special Interest Group meetings where issues around developments are discussed - and notes of those are available on the WebPA site: http://www.webpa.ac.uk/?q=node/487
>
> regards
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WebPA [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stefaan Vanbillemont
> Sent: 01 February 2012 08:16
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: WebPA - justification text
>
> Paul,
>
> Thanks! How can we be informed about new releases or important updates?
> Is that a different mailing list?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Stefaan
>
> Op 31/01/12 17:06, Paul Newman schreef:
>> Yes, once you enter the group marks you should find the report becomes available.
>>
>> Access to the student comments shouldn't really be restricted in this way, as the report should not require the group marks in its creation. The restriction was probably a mistake.
>>
>> --
>> Paul Newman
>> ----------------------------------------
>> IT Services Specialist (E-Learning Systems) Loughborough University
>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stefaan Vanbillemont
>> Sent: 31 January 2012 14:32
>> Subject: Re: WebPA - justification text
>>
>> Thanks for your quick reply. However I don't see that report. Is it possible that group marks should be entered first before the report is available?
>> See the screenshot attached (sorry, it is translated in dutch), these are the reports that are available.
>>
|