Yeah, we keep glexec so the experiment can ssh in the WNs.... back 10
years really.
cheers
alessandra
On 27/03/2012 15:14, John Gordon wrote:
> Ian Bird's summary to the MB was that the TEG (and all LHC VOs) now accepted that identity switching was required, and as Dave said, glexec is the way to do that until ma better one comes along.
>
> The request is for sites to install and publish the fact so that nagios monitoring can give test reliability etc.
>
> John
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Kelsey
>> Sent: 27 March 2012 14:49
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Ops meeting at 11am
>>
>> And I should have added that the VOs were of course members of the TEG.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> Dr David Kelsey
>> Particle Physics Department
>> Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
>> Chilton, DIDCOT, OX11 0QX, UK
>>
>> e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>> Tel: [+44](0)1235 445746 (direct)
>> Fax: [+44](0)1235 446733
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Kelsey
>>> Sent: 27 March 2012 14:48
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Ops meeting at 11am
>>>
>>> Jeremy et al,
>>>
>>> I can comment on that...
>>>
>>> Yes. The WLCG Security TEG did conclude that glExec is the only
>>> acceptable solution in the short-term.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> Dr David Kelsey
>>> Particle Physics Department
>>> Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
>>> Chilton, DIDCOT, OX11 0QX, UK
>>>
>>> e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>> Tel: [+44](0)1235 445746 (direct)
>>> Fax: [+44](0)1235 446733
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of J Coles
>>>> Sent: 27 March 2012 14:23
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: Ops meeting at 11am
>>>>
>>>>> Didn't the security TEG say it was still/again the approved
>>>>> solution,
>>>> to be used via the glidein WMS?
>>>>
>>>> The only available option from what I remember but I did not attend
>>>> the meeting. Perhaps Mingchao can comment?
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy
|