Tim Jenness wrote:
> So I'm wondering if
> a) Pat wants to send a note to the author of funtools
Not particularly. It sounds like what was done was consistent
with my intentions at the time.
> b) DS9 will build without the sla/ routines
It would simplify things if that turned out to be true. By all
means try it.
> Also, Doug Mink seems to think that Pat worked at Cambridge
> University (according to the readme)
He must have been misled by my know-it-all demeanour.
> slaDcs2c
> slaDcc2s
> slaDmxv
> slaImxv
> slaDranrm
> slaDrange
> slaDeuler
> slaDimxv
> slaDsep
> slaPreces
> slaPrebn
> slaPrec
I am happy for all of these to be adapted for free use. It would be
polite to use different names, perhaps changing the sla or making
the name part all uppercase, but that's not a stipulation.
BTW the SOFA tools for bulding rotation matrices are superior to
slaDeuler.
Patrick Wallace
____________________________________________________________________
Space Science & Technology Department +44-1235-531198
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Harwell Oxford
Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX, UK [log in to unmask]
____________________________________________________________________
|