Silly me thinking this would be simple... Let me look into this a bit more.
Thanks,
Chris
On 15 February 2012 18:11, John Ashburner <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> This may not be quite as simple as you think. If my understanding is
> correct, the matrices that FSL uses seem to be a legacy from the
> pre-NIfTI days. This complicates things slightly (see
> http://www.nitrc.org/snippet/detail.php?type=package&id=1 for more
> info).
>
> Best regards,
> -John
>
>
> On 15 February 2012 16:15, Chris Filo Gorgolewski
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would like to request a tiny feature feature which will cost very
>> little coding. In the Coregister batch jobs the estimated
>> transformation matrix is discarded. For interoperability with other
>> software it would be great if it was saved in a file (for example in
>> plain text format compatible with FSL). It would only require adding a
>> line or two to config/ spm_run_coreg_est.m and
>> config/spm_run_coreg_estwrite.m
>>
>> Best,
>> Chris
|