JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LCG-ROLLOUT Archives


LCG-ROLLOUT Archives

LCG-ROLLOUT Archives


LCG-ROLLOUT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LCG-ROLLOUT Home

LCG-ROLLOUT Home

LCG-ROLLOUT  February 2012

LCG-ROLLOUT February 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

GlueCEStateFreeCPUs / GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots

From:

Arnau Bria <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

LHC Computer Grid - Rollout <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:37:53 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (144 lines)

Hi all,

we are seeing a strange behaviour in our 4 creamCEs (still gLite 3.2).
All CEs use same separate pbs server, all publish same queues and
(should) have same configuration: rpm, scripts and involved config
files are identical. (glite-CREAM-3.2.14-1.sl5.x86_64,
lcg-info-dynamic-pbs-1.0.13-1.noarch lcg-info-dynamic-scheduler-generic-2.3.4-1.noarch, 
lcg-info-dynamic-scheduler-pbs-2.0.1-1.noarch, lcg-info-dynamic-software-1.0.5-0.noarch
, lcg-info-provider-software-1.0.6-1.noarch)


but something must be different because they behave different. 

When you query CE infosys, 2 of them always publish 0 FreeCPU and 0
FreeJobslot, and two of them publish 'correct' value of FreeCPU and 0
for FreeJobslot

[arnaubria@ui01 ~]$ check_service_bdii.sh ce07|grep FreeCPU
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 0
GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots: 0
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 0
GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots: 0
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 0
[arnaubria@ui01 ~]$ check_service_bdii.sh ce10|grep FreeCPU
GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots: 0
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 56
GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots: 0
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 56
GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots: 0
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 56

output of running pluguin (as edguser) in each CE (I'll paste one queue
info only)

[ce07]
-sh-3.2$ /opt/glite/etc/gip/plugin/glite-info-dynamic-ce
[...]
dn: GlueCEUniqueID=ce07.pic.es:8443/cream-pbs-glong_sl5,mds-vo-name=resource,o=grid
GlueCEInfoLRMSVersion: 2.5.9
GlueCEInfoTotalCPUs: 2649
GlueCEPolicyAssignedJobSlots: 2649
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 18
GlueCEPolicyMaxCPUTime: 4800
GlueCEPolicyMaxWallClockTime: 5220
GlueCEStateStatus: Production

$/opt/glite/etc/gip/plugin/glite-info-dynamic-scheduler-wrapper
[...]
dn: GlueCEUniqueID=ce07.pic.es:8443/cream-pbs-glong_sl5,mds-vo-name=resource,o=grid
GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots: 0
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 0
GlueCEStateRunningJobs: 1781
GlueCEStateWaitingJobs: 1310
GlueCEStateTotalJobs: 3091
GlueCEStateEstimatedResponseTime: 21003
GlueCEStateWorstResponseTime: 410292000



[ce10]
-sh-3.2$ /opt/glite/etc/gip/plugin/glite-info-dynamic-ce
dn: GlueCEUniqueID=ce10.pic.es:8443/cream-pbs-glong_sl5,mds-vo-name=resource,o=grid
GlueCEInfoLRMSVersion: 2.5.9
GlueCEInfoTotalCPUs: 2649
GlueCEPolicyAssignedJobSlots: 2649
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 50
GlueCEPolicyMaxCPUTime: 4800
GlueCEPolicyMaxWallClockTime: 5220
GlueCEStateStatus: Production


$/opt/glite/etc/gip/plugin/glite-info-dynamic-scheduler-wrapper
[...]
dn: GlueCEUniqueID=ce10.pic.es:8443/cream-pbs-glong_sl5,mds-vo-name=resource,o=grid
GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots: 0
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 0
GlueCEStateRunningJobs: 1774
GlueCEStateWaitingJobs: 1332
GlueCEStateTotalJobs: 3106
GlueCEStateEstimatedResponseTime: 21109
GlueCEStateWorstResponseTime: 417182400



(FreeCPU values are different due to the time when each command has
been executed).

So, as you can see, FreeJobSlots and FreeCPUs are always 0 when asking
to dynamic-scheduler-wrapper, but FreeCPUs is not 0 when asking
dynamic-ce. ***
I've noticed that when querying infosys, the order in which
FreeCPUs appear in each CE is not the same. In the one that publish 0,
FreeCPU appears just after Status, in the other, at the end:

# ce07.pic.es:8443/cream-pbs-glong_sl5, resource, grid
dn: GlueCEUniqueID=ce07.pic.es:8443/cream-pbs-glong_sl5,Mds-Vo-name=resource,o
 =grid
GlueCEStateStatus: Production
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 0   <------------------------------------------------
[...]


# ce10.pic.es:8443/cream-pbs-glong_sl5, resource, grid
dn: GlueCEUniqueID=ce10.pic.es:8443/cream-pbs-glong_sl5,Mds-Vo-name=resource,o
 =grid
GlueCEStateStatus: Production
GlueCEPolicyPriority: 1
[...]
GlueCEStateFreeJobSlots: 0
GlueCEInfoTotalCPUs: 2649
GlueCEPolicyAssignedJobSlots: 2649
GlueCEStateTotalJobs: 3139
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs: 29 <-------------------------------------------------
GlueCEStateEstimatedResponseTime: 21565



My first question is, which value should be used for publishing
GlueCEStateFreeCPUs? From bddi-update.log I understand that it must be
dynamic-ce, as it is the last command ran:

2012-02-14 11:43:58,811: [INFO] Running Plugins
2012-02-14 11:43:58,811: [DEBUG] Running /opt/glite/etc/gip/plugin/glite-info-dynamic-software-wrapper
2012-02-14 11:43:58,914: [DEBUG] Running /opt/glite/etc/gip/plugin/glite-info-dynamic-scheduler-wrapper
2012-02-14 11:44:03,325: [DEBUG] Running /opt/glite/etc/gip/plugin/glite-info-dynamic-ce

Is my assumption correct? If yes, what could be causing those
differences between both CEs?

*** About what FreeCPU means, when querying dynamic-ce, the total amount
of FreeCpus is calculated looking at nodes which are 'free' and
comparing how many jobs it is running and how many it could run /torque
np parameter). But, in our case, where maui takes between 5 and
10 minutes to schedule, is normal to have some FreeCpus, but just
because maui is scheduling or has not scheduled yet. But, as we have
many jobs in queue,  there are no real FreeCpus. So, FreeSlots, that
checks if there are queueud jobs (which really means if free slots
available) isn't what should be used for tools like lcg-info(sites).

Anyone could give a hand?

TIA,
Arnau

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
November 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
September 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
February 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager