JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Archives


CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Archives

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Archives


CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Home

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Home

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY  February 2012

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY February 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: A request for help[Scanned-Clean]

From:

John Meudell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:05:54 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (226 lines)

Many years ago, after cycling in London for a couple of years, I took my
bike up to Aberdeen and went cycling with a mate, a keen cyclist. After a
while he (helpfully) suggested that London cycling tactics didn’t go down
well up there. So know what you mean! (I'd note Amsterdam has a somewhat
similar reputation.)

But, the point is that all too often, cycling in London and other big cities
requires a much more positive, even aggressive style of riding, in part
because if you don't then you'll never get on the road let alone get
anywhere, and in part to stay alive. (Noting the comments that safe cycling
in London often involves breaking "the law" (not just in a legal sense))

Cheers

John



-----Original Message-----
From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Oddy, Nicholas
Sent: 03 February 2012 08:02
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A request for help[Scanned-Clean]

Hmm, admittedly I've not cycled in London for a few years, but I do not
remember the culture being that much different from anywhere else in the UK.
Maybe you should meet a few couriers, they are a fairly visible part of
cycling culture down there and to suggest that they are not that because
'you do not hang about with them' places your position not as not unlike
like that of the worthy middle classes living in the west of your city in
the 19th century not acknowledging the existence of the masses in the east
on the grounds that the never need to see them.
 
Nicholas Oddy

________________________________

From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list on behalf of gary
cummins
Sent: Wed 01/02/2012 21:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A request for help[Scanned-Clean]


Come on Nicholas, do you really believe that the active participants among
the 10,000 plus member of the London Cycling Campaign join, pay their £30
plus fee and spend weekends running stalls at civic events, volunteering at
repair workshops and leading recreational easy rides NOT to increase the
numbers cycling?

In all my time living in and cycling around London I never encountered the
type you describe above. I did not hang about with couriers I admit, but my
fellow cyclists were really in for the transport, not a lifestyle or sport,
simply a way to get about.

Gary Cummins


________________________________

Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:58:24 +0000
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A request for help[Scanned-Clean]
To: [log in to unmask]



What you have is the same problem that beset the high bicycle, fine when you
are on it, but it looks very dangerous...a long way to fall. There was no
solution, but the riders who were attracted to the machine did not really
want one. I'd suggest that many confident urban and A-road cyclists rather
enjoy their elite do-or-die status and are not that worried about increasing
the numbers.

 

Nicholas Oddy

 

From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tim Jones
Sent: 31 January 2012 10:46
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A request for help[Scanned-Clean]

 

Dear Chris and all

Interesting use of the word 'objectively'. Subjective is 'real' enough to
the 'subjects'. Of course people on this list will step forward and state,
"that is really not my experience of cycling in London..." with implication
that folk really just ought to get over it and try cycling to overcome their
fears (and cycle training can help prepare for this!).

I read an interesting analogy by Blogger Cyclinginfo (an adept racing and
commuter cyclist) http://cyclinginfo.co.uk/ this morning paraphrasing
Michael Hutchinson writing in Cycling Weekly a couple of weeks ago: "Cycle
around Kings Cross, London, and you can feel like a Lancaster bomber on a
low flying mission across occupied Europe - trying to remain unmoved by all
the flack coming from every angle. It's not a surprise American and London
cyclists are the most likely to wear a helmet, fluorescent jacket et al. ,
even if the effect is purely psychological, you feel like you need some kind
of protection."

As our Understanding Walking and Cycling research based on extensive
in-depth research across four cities outside of London made clear, we are
kidding ourselves if we think that a democratic landscape of cycling will
emerge out of the current transport system without radical overhaul. The key
is to eradicate the war not to encourage the trembling troops to train to go
into battle.

Tim Jones

On 31 January 2012 10:00, Chris Peck <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

"This really is not my experience of cycling in London (UK), I'd suggest
London (UK) is one of the more benign areas to cycle in in Britain hence
some areas of the inner city with 10% modal share of cycling and rising.
Cycling on rural A4 roads in Britain outwith built up areas can be far more
intimidating."

... and objectively more risky as well:

* 313 deaths per billion kms cycled on rural A-roads last year.

* 11 deaths per billion kms cycled on minor urban roads.

(see:
http://www.ctc.org.uk/resources/Campaigns/1110_CTC_Transcom_RSS-con-final.pd
f, from RAS30018)

 

________________________________

From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of gary cummins
Sent: 31 January 2012 09:40
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A request for help

 

John Meudell said:
 

On that particular point, I'd suggest making a clear distinction between the
UK and Europe. My experience is that, if you can cycle confidently cycle
around London without getting intimidated, run off the road or killed, you
can survive anywhere!


 

This really is not my experience of cycling in London (UK), I'd suggest
London (UK) is one of the more benign areas to cycle in in Britain hence
some areas of the inner city with 10% modal share of cycling and rising.
Cycling on rural A4 roads in Britain outwith built up areas can be far more
intimidating.

Gary Cummins


________________________________________________________________________
CTC - the UK's national cyclists' organisation provides a comprehensive
range of services, advice, events, and protection for its members.

CTC Charitable Trust, CTC's charity arm, works to promote cycling by raising
public and political awareness of its health, social and environmental
benefits, and by working with all communities to help realise those
benefits.

To find out more, to join or support CTC visit www.ctc.org.uk
<http://www.ctc.org.uk/> , or phone 0844 736 8451.

Cyclists' Touring Club, a company limited by guarantee, registered in
England number 25185.

CTC Charitable Trust, a company limited by guarantee, registered in England
number 5125969. Registered as a charity in England and Wales number 1104324
and in Scotland number SCO38626

Registered office: Parklands, Railton Road, Guildford, GU2 9JX

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by CTC. The service is powered
by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service
working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk
<http://www.star.net.uk/>
________________________________________________________________________




--
Research Fellow
Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development
& Department of Planning
Faculty of Technology Design and Environment
Oxford Brookes University
Gipsy Lane Campus
Oxford OX3 0BP
Tel +44 (0)1865 483436
[log in to unmask]
http://www.brookes.ac.uk/about/faculties/tde

EPSRC Understanding Walking and Cycling summary findings now available for
download:
http://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/17bb3ed2-1209-b3e9-5357-614f329af72e/
1/



Quote: ""A society which measures man's [sic] worth in terms of volume of
publications accumulated is no less sick than one which measures his worth
in terms of dollars amassed" (Stea 1969:1)."

 

Stea D (1969) Positions, purposes, pragmatics: A journal of radical
geography. Antipode 1(1):1-2

 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager