Ole, hello.
On 2012 Feb 16, at 15:58, OlŠµ Streicher wrote:
> You are right here. My idea was to have as less as possible differences
> to the original, and building a "starconf.m4" package would be quite
> small (in fact, just installing this one file).
>
> However, I now tried to extract the functions that were needed to
> compile AST (as it is now, with the sla/Fortran linked in). Could you
> have a look whether it looks as you would expect?
It's been a long time since I did anything with starconf, but that looks plausible to me (given that you're going to be working with a predictable Fortran, so can basically hard-wire the results of the tests).
All the best,
Norman
--
Norman Gray : http://nxg.me.uk
SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK
|