I regretted sending this
Tone was wrong or might be read so
Just meant...
well, I meant, sure
I never went into that deeply. I remember thinking well they wouldn't
wouldn't they?
They're barking mad but they're not stupid.
They can write up my work if they want. Lecture tour of the states,
denouncing the follies of the day... Maybe not
L
---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Re: Fresh, detailed, inside information on the CIA's
distanced orchestration of Abstract Expressionism during the Cold War
From: "Lawrence Upton" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, February 21, 2012 18:31
To: "Poetryetc: poetry and poetics" <[log in to unmask]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
er
yes
i remember reading that in 1995?
ok that's about right
L
On Tue, February 21, 2012 18:25, Barry Alpert wrote:
> The header should convince you to click on this link to this article in a
> British newspaper (I connected with the text immediately / no
> registration required):
>
> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808
> .html
>
>
>
> I could regale you with amazing tales of the CIA's subsequent presence
> within everyday life in the worlds of literature and the other arts of
> the Wash DC area.
>
> But I won't.
>
>
>
> Barry
>
>
-----
UNFRAMED PICTURES by Lawrence Upton
42 pages; A5 paperback; colour cover
Writers Forum 978 1 84254 277 4
wfuk.org.uk/blog
----
-----
UNFRAMED PICTURES by Lawrence Upton
42 pages; A5 paperback; colour cover
Writers Forum 978 1 84254 277 4
wfuk.org.uk/blog
----
|