JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  February 2012

OCC-HEALTH February 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Latex gloves

From:

Teresa Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:16:39 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (93 lines)

Very interesting 

Kind Regards 
Teresa Fox 
Occupational Health and Wellbeing Nurse Specialist.

Orchard Gate Enterprises Ltd- delivering robust attendance management and performance advice to businesses of all sizes . 

Tel: 07970050225
 On the move via iPhone


On 10 Feb 2012, at 14:12, Chris Packham <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Lindsey
> 
> You are spot on! Prior to the "universal barrier precaution" policy coming
> into being (and not just in the UK) there were few manufacturers in the Far
> East for the single use latex gloves (I have been told just 14 but cannot
> verify this). Quality was generally high, with low free protein levels. Even
> with the use of powder at that time there was no 'latex epidemic' since the
> powder could not combine with the proteins that were not bioavailable. With
> the enormous increase in the requirement for single use latex gloves, the
> existing manufacturers could not cope and a whole raft of new producers
> appeared. The impression I have from what I have read and my visit to
> Malaysia for the Malaysian Rubber Manufacturers' Association is that these
> were less concerned with quality and more with maximising profit. At the
> same time the vast increase in glove use was putting pressure on healthcare
> budgets, so the drive to find cheaper gloves developed. Thus high free
> protein gloves started to appear, since these were cheaper to manufacture.
> Since the post vulcanisation chemical treatment was also skipped (cost
> saving again), the gloves were 'sticky' and difficult to don, so powder
> (modified corn starch) was applied as a 'lubricant'. This acted as a carrier
> for the latex proteins which could now become airborne and inhaled.
> According my conversations with a German expert (Prof. Henning Allmers),
> sensitisation develops from inhalation exposure, but can then manifest
> itself as a skin problem.
> 
> In her book "Allergien gegen Latexhandschuhe" (unfortunately only available
> in German) Dr. Angelika Heese has a table showing the free protein as
> measured by the Lowry method in various gloves. This varies from less than
> 10 to over 500, a significant range. Prof. Turjanmaa and her group studies
> this and commented that: "The gloves in categories 'very low' and 'low'
> contain such low levels of the main natural rubber allergens that they are
> suitable not only for non-allergenic persons but also for most of the
> sensitized users." Turjanmaa K, Kanto M, Kautiainen H, Reunala T, Palosuo T;
> Long-term follow-up of 160 adult patients with natural rubber latex allergy;
> J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002, 110, 70-74
> 
> The problem with nitrile is that many of the same chemicals (thiurams,
> mercaptobenzothiazoles, etc.) are used in the manufacture of the single use
> gloves, although the more expensive ones often avoid the use of these. Thus
> the more expensive ones are less likely to initiate sensitisation and
> allergic contact dermatitis. Guess which version tend to be purchased. 
> 
> Whilst manufacturers - at least the good and responsible ones - will
> indicate or advise on the level of free protein in their gloves, I have not
> yet managed to get the same level of information on nitrile gloves on the
> levels of free chemicals.
> 
> Note also that I am referring exclusively to 'single use' gloves. There has
> never been any significant type I latex allergy problem with the reusable
> gloves, such as for household work, cleaning, etc.
> 
> Hope this is of some help.
> 
> Chris 
> 
> Chris Packham
> FRSPH, FInstSMM, MCMI, MIIRSM, MBICSc
> EnviroDerm Services
> Unit 10, Building 11, The Mews, Mitcheldean, GL17 0SN
> Tel: +44 1386 832 311 (office), Mobile: +44 7818 035 898
> www.enviroderm.co.uk
> 
> ********************************
> Please remove this footer before replying.
> 
> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
> 
> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

********************************
Please remove this footer before replying.

OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager