On 23/01/2012 09:29, "Nicole Harris" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>Look at your shib logs? Probably the best way. I can tell you the
>usage of SAML 1 vs SAML 2 within the federation, but that doesn't really
>answer your question.
Assuming I'm reading the logs correctly:
$ cut -d: -f 5,6,8 idp-audit-2012-*.log | cut -d\| -f 1 | sort | uniq -c
9782 profiles:AuthnRequest
9332 SAML:1.0:SOAP-binding
148 SAML:2.0:HTTP-POST
8178 SAML:2.0:HTTP-Redirect
... suggests that we rely quite heavily on SAML1 :(
*BANG* out of the water goes that idea :-)
Ta!
--
Matthew Slowe <[log in to unmask]> | Tel: +44 (0)1227 824265
Server Infrastructure Team, IS | Fax: +44 (0)1227 824078
University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent | Web: http://www.kent.ac.uk/
|