JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Archives


EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Archives

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Archives


EAST-WEST-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Home

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH Home

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH  January 2012

EAST-WEST-RESEARCH January 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Conference: "Blackbox Youth. New Perspectives on East-European Youth Cultures" (Berlin, 02.-03. November 2012)

From:

"Serguei A. Oushakine" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Serguei A. Oushakine

Date:

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:32:41 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Please submit an abstract of no more than 300 words together with a short CV before February 15, 2012, for consideration to Heike Winkel ([log in to unmask]) or Matthias Schwartz ([log in to unmask]).



Conference: "Blackbox Youth. New Perspectives on East-European Youth Cultures"

Berlin, 02.-03. November 2012



Call for Papers 



Organization: Heike Winkel (Freie Universität Berlin, Peter Szondi Institute of Comparative Literature) and Matthias Schwartz (Freie Universität Berlin, Institute for East-European Studies)



The youth are in great demand, for they symbolize the future of society, and that future is constantly up for debate. The political potential of young people became apparent once again during the revolutions in the Arab world, all of which were greatly shaped by young activists. As a result, we are witnessing a repeat of the scenario familiar from the uprisings that occurred throughout Eastern Europe during the last decade. The “Orange Revolution” in Ukraineawakened hopes both in its Eastern European neighbors and in the West of a political turning point initiated by the young generation in the country. This event led to a debate about the social-political role of young people. The relevance of this debate to the present-day is confirmed by the events in the Arab world and the latest protests in Russia. The trajectory of the discussion reveals both a social need to project collective wishes onto a society’s young people and societies’ obvious helplessness when it comes to critically reflecting on the disappointment stemming from the exaggerated expectations.



We see this as a sign of a far-reaching epistemological problem. It seems that the established concept of “the youth”, as it crystallized at the end of the 19th century, is no longer suited to adequately describing the role of young people in the current post-industrial and globalized society. The planned conference therefore asks whether the study of literature, and other academic disciplines, have too long maintained an anachronistic definition of the youth and have failed to re-examine the category’s premise. We aim to initiate an open-ended and unbiased discussion of quintessential developments, results and discourses that are central to the youth cultures in Eastern European countries, in order to examine the expectations that are linked with the idea of young people. The discussion could lead to a fundamental revision of the concept of the youth or, conversely, demonstrate that the concept is no longer viable. It may turn out to be possible to use the example of Eastern Europe to show that adolescence is a specific socially, politically and culturally defined phase of a person’s life that is beginning to disappear in the globalized world of the 21st century.



 

If we take a look at the perception of the youth in Eastern Europe that has so far been prevalent in the media and academia, we can see that this concept proves to be extremely inconsistent. After the collapse of the socialist societies in the region, many hoped that the young people would complete the political transformation into a better world for which their parents had fought. When this “generational transformation” failed to happen, various stereotypes emerged. On the one hand, there existed the cliché of the completely disillusioned youth, frozen in apathy, like the proverbial Polish “Generation Nothing” of those who grew up after the fall of Communism. On the other hand, there existed the fear, expressed with an attitude of cultural criticism, that the young people might become politically radicalized due to the lack of socio-political opportunities and be caught up in ideologically easily manipulated movements, such as the youth organization “Our Own” (Svoi) controlled by the Kremlin in Russia or the right-wing extremist “Garde” in Hungary.



When attempting to describe the lack of illusions about politics, on the one hand, and ideological delusion on the other, both journalism and academia often work with supposedly well-established knowledge about the youth as a descriptive category. In particular, the term “generation” functions as a sign that is very popular among the media while simultaneously scientifically highly problematic, as it tends to interpret unique phenomena as symptomatic expressions of an entire age cohort, in order to be able to construct an unambiguous social and cultural identity based on historical experiences and events. Within the context of Eastern European transformation societies, with their rapid changes in values and experiences, this operation leads to the construction of ever newer youth generations whose believed sequence is meant to illustrate social change or, on the contrary, leads to all Eastern European youth cultures since 1989 being subsumed under the general umbrella of one political concept of generation. Yet it is precisely such uniform generational experiences as the foundation of youth identity that are being called into question in post-socialist globalized societies. A historicizing of the concept of generation, which could lead out of the terminological crisis, has so far never advanced beyond a few initial attempts.



Calling the entire generation model into question also results in problematizing the category of “youth”. It is noticeable that many behavior and action patterns of young people in Eastern Europecan no longer be described as specifically youthful, such as in terms of rebellion against one’s parents or as an escape from a state-sanctioned establishment. Instead, Eastern European young people appear to be seamlessly adopting the cultural value concepts and the social habitus of the adults who were disappointed by the transformation. In academic research, scholars even speak of a historic inversion of the roles in this context. The youth thereby become equivalent to a conceptual black box whose output does not seem to correspond to any of the aspirations assigned by cultural theory and social science to them or any of the anthropological characteristics developed for them.



The goal of the planned conference is to overcome this methodological and conceptual “black box“. In order to do so, we would like to conduct a discussion in four interdisciplinary sections on parameters that are generally constitutive for the concept of the youth and that have – according to our thesis – changed considerably over the last twenty years. This discussion may enable us to question the explanatory potential of established models and to actively find constructivist approaches to defining the concept of the youth.



 

Section 1: The Redefinition of the Political. In the past, the political potential of young people was usually perceived in their uncompromising idealism. Young people seemed to represent clear, usually “progressive” ideological positions and joined clearly defined political factions. Today, however, young people realize their social engagement far outside of the established structures and ideological programs of their parents. For this section, we are looking for contributions that deal with the new politicization patterns of young people without immediately paternalistically infantilizing these as naive or backwards. Which designs for political ways of existing can be found, for example, in the literary works of young authors and in alternative youth cultures today? Which locally and transnationally shaped realms of experience serve as the foundation for this socio-political engagement among young people? How are social structures and strategies interpreted as alternative forms of expression of the political, or can these structures and strategies even still be called “political”? We are especially interested in seemingly contradictory, irritating behavior patterns and actions of young activists, for example, the appropriation of both soviet as well as national socialist symbolism by the Russian “National Bolshevists” or the global linking and professionalization of the Serbian activist group “Otpor” as an advisory institution for social transformations.





Section 2: The Revision of the Social. A redefinition of the political also requires revising the definition of the social. The finding that supposedly apolitical lethargy, passivity and stark consumption exist among the majority of young people rests on a conservative understanding of the societas, which fails to recognize new forms of social organization, social belonging and societal participation. In this regard, we are particularly interested in contributions that deal with every-day culture and social engagement as seen from cultural theoretical, ethnological and everyday historical perspectives. How do new networks, such as online via Facebook, Live-Journal and Twitter, shape social communication? How do new forms of emotional communality emerge and are these really basically different from the adolescent subcultures of the 1960s, ‘70s and ‘80s? Are today’s micro-collectives less demanding than their rebellious predecessors? Or does social-critical potential coexist with the consumption-oriented lifestyle?





Section 3: The Transformation of the Imaginary. Closely linked to the question on the social conditions of young people’s engagement is the question regarding the functioning of the imaginary. The ability commonly ascribed to young people to believe in the realization of utopias, to develop visions of the future and to project new lifestyles, seems to have made way for a sober pragmatism or has been ideologically corrupted. But what does the disappearance of the utopian mean for the concept of “the youth”? In this section, we are looking for contributions that explore the functions and transformations of the imaginary, especially from the perspectives of cultural and literary theory. What happens to the collective imaginary when young people access global pop cultures, fashions and trends through their communication-based social networks and adapt them to their own everyday lives? Do these adaptions exist only through the passive, non-critical consumption of predefined image worlds, or are new complex systems of symbolic recognition created from them? If young people no longer claim a universal validity for their political, cultural and artistic practice, does that mean that their goals, wishes and expectations focus purely on the private? Or can an imaginary be identified that exists outside of the traditional idealistic ideas but nonetheless serves to shape the future?





Section 4: The Concept of the Youth. This section brings together contributions that examine to what extent the reassessment of the youth as a cultural ideal, social factor and political force leads to new opportunities for the conceptual renewal of the concept of “the youth”. Do the established categories suffice to make adolescence describable, or do we need new parameters? This epistemological problem provides opportunities for the discussion of future possibilities for young people’s engagement as cultural practice in a globalized world: How is the role of “the youth” shaped – in Eastern Europe as well as in other regions – not only in phases of social transformation or crisis-based change, but particularly in periods of relative continuity and stability? What type of self-image do young people form in relation to their age, what social expectations are projected onto them, and how do these interact?





Proposals for papers are invited from those working in Literature, Cultural Studies, Area Studies Eastern Europe, Everyday History, Ethnology, the Social Sciences and Political Science. All papers will be circulated before the conference to leave ample room for discussion among its 20-25 participants. The conference will be held in Berlin from 2.-3. November 2012. Depending on conference funding, we may be able to cover costs for travel and accommodation. The conference language will be English. A publication of the papers is planned. Please submit an abstract of no more than 300 words together with a short CV before February 15, 2012, for consideration to Heike Winkel ([log in to unmask]) or Matthias Schwartz ([log in to unmask]).







Heike Winkel, Dr. des.



Freie Universität Berlin



Peter Szondi Institute of Comparative Literature



Habelschwerdter Allee 45

Gebäude Rost- und Silberlaube

14195 Berlin



Mail: [log in to unmask]



Matthias Schwartz, Dr. des.



Freie Universität Berlin



Institute for East-European Studies



Garystr. 55



14195 Berlin



Mail: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager