JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  January 2012

CCP4BB January 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Expression of Viral proteins for crystallography

From:

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:20:29 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (152 lines)

Inspired by the recent post about "quasispecies:"

I have been bothered recently by the following problem: why do species
of genetic uniformity exist at all (or do they?)? This first came up
when I saw a Nature paper describing live bacteria extracted from a
supposedly 250-million-year-old salt crystal whose 16S RNA was 99%
identical to marismortui bacteria (ref below). What? Are the bacteria
the same now as 250 million years ago? But there is a further
question: given the assumptions of evolution, why should there be any
bacterium whose genome is the same as any other, assuming that
equivalent codons are really equivalent (or at least roughly so), and
that even at the protein level, there is such a thing as "neutral
drift?" After all, we even see in our lab cultures that they (at least
e coli) mutate fairly frequently, so why is there such a thing as "e
coli" at all, at least at the nucleotide level? I don't think we
usually say that each bacterial species is totally optimized in all
its features, do we? Even assuming that every single protein must be
just so, shouldn't there be as many species of e coli as there are
possible genomes encoding the same protein set, i.e. some extremely
large number? Why is there any uniformity at all? Or IS there--maybe
the bacteria too are only quasispecies...? And maybe also...

JPK




Nature 407, 897-900 (19 October 2000) | doi:10.1038/35038060; Received
15 November 1999; Accepted 4 July 2000

Isolation of a 250 million-year-old halotolerant bacterium from a
primary salt crystal

Russell H. Vreeland1, William D. Rosenzweig1 & Dennis W. Powers2

Department of Biology, West Chester University, West Chester,
Pennsylvania 19383 , USA
Consulting Geologist, Box 87, Anthony, Texas 79821, USA
Correspondence to: Russell H. Vreeland1 Correspondence and requests
for materials should be addressed to R.H.V. (e-mail: Email:
[log in to unmask]).

Top of page
Bacteria have been found associated with a variety of ancient
samples1, however few studies are generally accepted due to questions
about sample quality and contamination. When Cano and Borucki2
isolated a strain of Bacillus sphaericus from an extinct bee trapped
in 25–30 million-year-old amber, careful sample selection and
stringent sterilization techniques were the keys to acceptance. Here
we report the isolation and growth of a previously unrecognized
spore-forming bacterium (Bacillus species, designated 2-9-3) from a
brine inclusion within a 250 million-year-old salt crystal from the
Permian Salado Formation. Complete gene sequences of the 16S ribosomal
DNA show that the organism is part of the lineage of Bacillus
marismortui and Virgibacillus pantothenticus. Delicate crystal
structures and sedimentary features indicate the salt has not
recrystallized since formation. Samples were rejected if brine
inclusions showed physical signs of possible contamination. Surfaces
of salt crystal samples were sterilized with strong alkali and acid
before extracting brines from inclusions. Sterilization procedures
reduce the probability of contamination to less than 1 in 10 9.

2012/1/24 Darren Hart <[log in to unmask]>:
> I think the explanation is this:
> The source is natural viral RNA which is a mixture of naturally mutated
> sequences (e.g. flu forms such a quasispecies)
> See:
> http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/11/the-quasispecies-concept/
>
> The pooled RNA has an average sequence that you see when you sequence the
> pooled cDNA (individual mutations are hidden by the averaging effect of
> having many sequences present).
>
> But when you clonally separate DNA molecules by transformation (1 plasmid
> enters 1 cell to yield 1 colony), you see each individual molecule
> represented 100% in the sequencing chromatogram from the plasmid DNA that
> you have isolated from colonies.
>
> This is effect is commonly observed when sequencing influenza virus isolates
> from patients. It will have nothing to do with the E. coli strain. You can
> avoid it completely by using gene synthesis.
>
> Darren
>
>
>
> 2012/1/24 Rubén Sánchez Eugenia <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> Dear everyone,
>>
>> I am trying to clone a viral protein in the E. Coli BSJ strain and i am
>> having some problems.
>>
>> I start from the viral RNA carrying out a reverse transcription and PCR
>> (RT-PCR) to obtain the protein cDNA. When I sequence this cDNA to check for
>> mutations, there are no mutations. So the RT-PCR works fine.
>>
>> Then, I digest the cDNA and I ligate it with a pET plasmid to transform
>> the E. Coli BSJ strain. I get recombinant colonies (checked by colony-PCR)
>> but when I sequence them I get various mutations (aprox. 2 miss-sense) on
>> the inserted cDNA. Furthermore, these mutations are different among
>> different transformations and even among colonies of the same plate (in the
>> same transformation).
>>
>> Maybe these mutations are produced by the cell (because of the lack of
>> mutations in the cDNA) but these E. Coli clonning strains are supposed to be
>> "optimized" to prevent the insertion of mutations. So I have no idea about
>> what may be the problem.
>>
>> I hope you could help me. Thank you.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> --
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> Rubén Sánchez
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> **********************************************************************
> Dr. Darren Hart,
> Team Leader
> High Throughput Protein Lab
> Grenoble Outstation
> European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
> **********************************************************************
> www.embl.fr/research/unit/hart/index.html
>
> For funded access to ESPRIT construct screening via EU FP7 PCUBE:
> http://tinyurl.com/ydnrwg4
>
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Tel: +33 4 76 20 77 68
> Fax: +33 4 76 20 71 99
> Skype: hartdarren
> Postal address: EMBL, 6 rue Jules Horowitz, BP181, 38042 Grenoble, Cedex
> 9, France
> **********************************************************************



--
*******************************************
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
email: [log in to unmask]
*******************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager