JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY  December 2011

SOCIAL-POLICY December 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

"MSPs reject UK welfare reforms"

From:

Adrian Sinfield <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Adrian Sinfield <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:47:45 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (90 lines)

This was the Herald's headline to a report on the Scottish  
Parliament's debate on welfare reform yesterday - over two hours with  
118 of the 129 MSPs voting.  The Scotsman took the line of the  
supporters of the UK Coalition: 'Holyrood's defiance could deprive  
needy of benefits, SNP told' (links to debate and the two papers far  
below).

The Daily Record echoed rejection in its headline but provided the  
longest report and I think the most useful with its opening sentence:  
THE Scottish Parliament has refused to rubber-stamp controversial  
benefit changes linked to Iain Duncan Smith's welfare reform programme.
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics-news/2011/12/22/snp-and- 
labour-msps-unite-as-scottish-parliament-reject-westminster-plans-for- 
welfare-reform-86908-23653897/

It is the first time that a legislative consent motion to Westminster  
legislation has not been passed by the Scottish parliament, but the  
basic welfare reforms going through the UK parliament will continue.   
What are likely to be affected by the partial refusal of consent are  
the areas which are or will be within the Scottish jurisdiction such  
as free school meals, passported benefits, disabled parking and  
devolved council tax benefit.  How much money and where it will come  
from are questions to be argued over.  An ad hoc welfare committee  
will be set up to take this further.

The debate indicated the degree of dissatisfaction with the proposed  
reforms, and much use was made of material provided by third sector  
and pressure groups.

Best wishes - and warm seasonal greetings, yours, Adrian

The amended motion below was agreed to without a vote.

'That the Parliament supports the principle of a welfare system that  
is simpler, makes work pay and lifts people out of poverty but  
regrets that this principle, insofar as it is reflected by the  
introduction of universal credit and personal independence payments,  
is being undermined by the UK Government’s deep and damaging cuts to  
benefits and services that will impact on some of the most vulnerable  
people in Scotland; on the matter of legislative consent, agrees that  
the relevant provisions of the Welfare Reform Bill, introduced in the  
House of Commons on 16 February 2011, in respect of data sharing,  
Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit and the Social Mobility and  
Child Poverty Commission, so far as these matters fall within the  
legislative competence of the Parliament, or alter the executive  
competence of the Scottish Ministers, should be considered by the UK  
Parliament; further agrees that the provisions in the Bill that give  
the Scottish Ministers the power to make consequential,  
supplementary, incidental or transitional provisions, by regulations,  
in relation to the introduction of universal credit and personal  
independence payments, so far as these matters fall within the  
legislative competence of the Parliament, or alter the executive  
competence of the Scottish Ministers, should not be considered by the  
UK Parliament but that the necessary provision should be made instead  
by an Act of the Scottish Parliament; also agrees that an ad-hoc  
welfare committee should be convened with a remit to consider the  
implementation of the Welfare Reform Bill insofar as it affects  
people in Scotland, in particular the impact on passported benefits  
and, where benefits are devolved, the principles and operation of  
these, complementing the work of other relevant committees in the  
Scottish Parliament, UK Parliament and devolved assemblies across the  
UK and that this committee should continue to meet for the duration  
of the current parliamentary session; while agreeing the above  
position, urges the UK Government to reconsider the Welfare Reform  
Bill and, more broadly, its welfare reform agenda, which the  
Parliament considers will adversely affect vulnerable people across  
Scotland.'


The link to the full debate follows.  If you want details of votes on  
the amendments, click on 'Decision Time' at the very end.
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28862.aspx? 
r=6647&i=60537&c=1255425&s=welfare%20reform

The Herald coverage http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/political- 
news/msps-reject-uk-welfare-reforms.1324609482
The Scotsman  http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/ 
holyrood_s_defiance_could_deprive_needy_of_benefits_snp_told_1_2022326

Adrian Sinfield
[log in to unmask]





-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager