On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 04:57:49PM +0000, Jane Greenberg wrote:
> Just wondering if there might be a way to gather data/feedback before a
> meeting, and see if there are items that can be checked off as okay, and
> issues really requiring discussion could be flagged. Maybe a Google doc
> where people could indicate, "okay" or "let's discuss" (w/some points on the
> issues for folks to ponder).
I agree that we need a better interface. The ideal would be to have an
interface that helps us make the mapping decision -- then documents that
decision on the Web, perhaps with a feedback mechanism where people can
comment on individual alignments. A wiki page is thinkable, but that would
take alot of manual maintenance effort (as would a Google doc).
I'm thinking the back-end data, maintained perhaps as RDF/XML in Git, could
perhaps somehow be exposed in a Web page that allows such feedback.
The point is that we somehow need to set up a workflow that allows us to
handle an alignment from proposal to publication without having to resort to
time-consuming, error-prone cut-and-paste operations (e.g., see [1]).
[1] http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/Schema.org_Alignment/Mappings_Details
> I suspect there's not a whole lot of time between now and tomorrow's telecom,
> but perhaps we'll consider some way to gather group feedback post-telecon if
> we don't get through everything.
Ah, but tomorrow's telecon is about DCAM [2]; the next Schema.org call will
be in January.
Tom
[2] https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1112&L=DC-ARCHITECTURE&F=&S=&P=15063
--
Tom Baker <[log in to unmask]>
|