My understanding is that the desire to run cvmfs_fsck on a regular basis
actually comes from problems with corruption that have now been fixed.
The Tier-1 hit them and ran cvmfs_fsck on a regular basis. Manchester
also ran into the problem and filed a ticket. Once I'd fixed QMUL's
StoRM problems I noticed lots of failed analysis jobs on a subset of
nodes - sending the dodgy files to Jakob resulted in a fixed cvmfs a
couple of weeks later. I've not seen problems since (Adding regular
cvmfs_fsck is still on my todo list). Chris
yes, the problem if in the ticket I opened and it is corrected in
version 2.0.3
http://northgrid-tech.blogspot.com/2011/09/cvmfs-upgrade-to-203.html
I updated the wiki
https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/UK_CVMFS_Deployment#cvmfs_fsck_setup
|