if this VO is hosted in the UK then I am happy to ask for an exemption as the NGI.
Historically this wasn't imposed retrospectively so existing VOs like the LHC ones and many others weren't asked to change. The case for an exemption is that this is a long-standing VO, not a new one; it is just the registration in the cic portal that is new. What evidence do we have for this assertion? How long has it been in VOMS? How many sites support it? More than one country? Does it have existing data?
I suspect like the DREAM VO recently, the hurdle might be technically in the portal rather than procedurally.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ewan MacMahon
> Sent: 03 October 2011 23:48
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Moving VO name - is there a standard way.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Colling
> >
> >
> > i agree with everything that you say. Can you think of who to
> approach to
> > try get an exemption?
> >
> Have there been any exceptions already? In particular, what
> about the big LHC VOs?
>
> Ewan
|