no, it was just the metadata.
________________________________________
From: Open Educational Resources [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:23 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Xpert Attribution
Did you use exif data?
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 27/10/11 15:26, Steven Stapleton wrote:
>>
>> For example, a horse uploaded in flickr
>> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/nottinghamvets/5927688738/in/set-72157626878331180>
>> with unique code ‘C0004P0038’ can then be searched for by that code in Xpert
>> <http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xpert/attribution/index.php?searchterm=C0004P0038>
>> and by selecting the image with attribution from Xpert you end up with this
>> <http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xpert/attribution/pictureattrib/mangle.php?url=http://farm5.static.flickr.com/6004/5927688738_82cd234583_b.jpg&original_url=http://www.flickr.com/63061739@N06/5927688738/&license=flickr_1&flickr_id=5927688738&size=full&picturename=C0004P0038>.
>> You can then save the image or embed it into PowerPoint.
>
> Is there any reason why the photo on Flickr shouldn't have the attribution
> info on it? I'm not sure if flickr allows you to update photos, but I've
> worked on a project which uploaded photos + metadata to Flickr through their
> API, and if Xpert attribution tool (or something based on it) could be put
> into that workflow then the info could be added during the upload.
>
> Phil
>
> --
> Ubuntu: not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity.
>This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
|