JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  October 2011

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Antw: SV: c-section for all women who request it by NICE?

From:

Knape Nina <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>, Knape Nina <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:38:44 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (223 lines)

Hi Jette,

take the link from Carolyn Roth, it works!
http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG/WaveR/97/Consultation/Latest
Best regards from Germany 
Nina Knape

Nina Knape
Diplom-Kauffrau (FH)
Hochschule Osnabrück
- Verbund Hebammenforschung -
Postfach 1940
D-49009 Osnabrück
Tel. 0541/969- 3473
Fax 0541/ 969-3765 
[log in to unmask]


>>> Jette Aaroe Clausen <[log in to unmask]> 10/31/2011 10:31  >>>
I tried to open the links that Soo Downe send earlier (se below), but
they are empty. I wounder what this implies? is there really a (draft)
report? and where can I locate it?

All the best

Jette

________________________________
Fra: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health
research. [[log in to unmask]] På vegne af McCourt,
Christine [[log in to unmask]] 
Sendt: 31. oktober 2011 09:01
Til: [log in to unmask] 
Emne: Re: c-section for all women who request it by NICE?

With this in mind, all those who are concerned should send evidence and
responses to NICE during the consultation period


On 31/10/2011 00:49, "Octavia Wiseman"
<[log in to unmask]<https://webmail.phmetropol.dk/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>>
wrote:

This is where the story came from – it’s still a draft report,
subject to change:

http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16099301 

From: LUCIA ROCCA <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 11:05 PM
To:
[log in to unmask]<https://webmail.phmetropol.dk/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>
Subject: Re: c-section for all women who request it by NICE?

Yes, and also in a bleak economic climate it seems quite wrong to
increase expenses without reason.

Plastic surgery is getting safer and safer....
are we going to have cosmetic breasts inplans for free as well for all
women who request it?

I am quite shocked if NICE publishes a report in support of free CS
without medical indication and I think we should look into protesting
against it.

Best wishes

Lucia

2011/10/30 Soo Downe
<[log in to unmask]<https://webmail.phmetropol.dk/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>>



Hmm  - CS is now safe? Maybe it depends on what outcomes you look at:
These are the  risks cited in the current NICE CS guidelines:





NICE 2004 Cesarean section: Quick reference guide.  Available at:
http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10940/29333/29333.pdfdopwnloaded
 on 6th Oct 2011
<http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10940/29333/29333.pdfdopwnloaded%20on%206th%20Oct%202011>













Longer term, CS has also been linked to type one diabetes in the
neonate,  athsma, excema, and, most recently, multiple sclerosis:




Mult  Scler. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21982872#>  2011 Oct
7. [Epub ahead of print]

Cesarean  delivery may increase the risk of multiple sclerosis.

Maghzi AH
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Maghzi%20AH%22%5BAuthor%5D>
, Etemadifar M
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Etemadifar%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D>
, Heshmat-Ghahdarijani K
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Heshmat-Ghahdarijani%20K%22%5BAuthor%5D>
, Nonahal S
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Nonahal%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D>
, Minagar A
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Minagar%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D>
, Moradi V
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Moradi%20V%22%5BAuthor%5D>
.


Source


IRCOMS, Iran/Neuroimmunology Unit, Centre for  Neuroscience & Trauma,
Blizard Inst. of Cell &Molecular Sci.,UK/Med.  Schl, Isfahan Uni. of
Med.Sci, Iran.


Abstract


Background: Prenatal and perinatal factors  are believed to contribute
to the risk of developing multiple  sclerosis (MS). Objective: This
study was designed to evaluate whether  mode of delivery (vaginal versus
cesarean section), as a  perinatal factor, affects susceptibility to MS.
Methods: MS patients were  recruited from the MS registry of Isfahan
Multiple Sclerosis  Society (IMSS) and were compared with their healthy
siblings. Data regarding  mode of delivery, birth order, and gestation
week of birth were obtained  through a specially designed questionnaire.
Preterm or post term deliveries  were excluded. We used conditional
logistic regression statistics and adjusted  for gender and birth order.
Results: This study included 1349 participants  (449 MS patients and 900
controls). Subjects who were born by cesarean  sectionhad significant
risk of MS (odds ratio, OR = 2.51; 95%  confidence interval, CI:
1.43-4.41; p = 0.001). There was significant MS risk  for females who
were born by cesarean section (OR = 2.69, 95% CI:  1.30-5.58; p =
0.008), but not for males (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 0.90-5.63; p =  0.082).
The mean age at onset was lower in MS patients born by cesarean  section
(24.58 ± 6.33) compared with that of patients born by vaginal  delivery
(27.59 ± 7.97; p = 0.041). There was no significant difference  between
the two groups for birth order (p = 0.417). Conclusion: Our results 
suggest that those born by vaginal delivery are at a lower risk of
subsequent  MS. These preliminary findings will need to be addressed in
a much larger and  preferably prospective study.


  PMID:   21982872   [PubMed  - as supplied by publisher]


________________________________

From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive  health
research.
[[log in to unmask]<https://webmail.phmetropol.dk/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>]
on behalf of Pamela  Harnden
[[log in to unmask]<https://webmail.phmetropol.dk/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>]
Sent: Sunday, October 30,  2011 10:25 PM
To:
[log in to unmask]<https://webmail.phmetropol.dk/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>
Subject: Re:  c-section for all women who request it by NICE?






Dear Lucia,


The impression in Australia is that it is true and that the risks are
so  small now because the obstetricians are so expert at it, the
suggestion is  that it is actually safer than birthing normally!



Pam


On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:18 AM, LUCIA ROCCA
<[log in to unmask]<https://webmail.phmetropol.dk/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>>
wrote:

Dear All,

I am sure this must be misinformation but  I am a bit worried about the
news from Sky news:

http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16099301 

about  NICE publishing a new report saying that women must have the
right to ask,  at NHS expenses, a CS without medical indication.

could please  somebody reassure me ( while I am on holiday...) that I
got it  wrong?

Thanks

Lucia

--

Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho

Senior Midwife and Research  Fellow

Barts and the London NHS  Trust

07989  230313

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager