Dear Adrian,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 06:29:50PM +0200, Adrian Goldman wrote:
> I have no problem with this idea as an opt-in. However I loathe being forced to do things - for my own good or anyone else's. But unless I read the tenor of this discussion completely wrongly, opt-in is precisely what is not being proposed.
I understood it slightly different - see Gerard Bricogne's points in
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1110&L=CCP4BB&F=&S=&P=363135
which sounds very much like an opt-in? Such a starting point sounds
very similar to that we had with initial PDB submission (optional for
publication) and then structure factor deposition.
Cheers
Clemens
--
***************************************************************
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
*
* Global Phasing Ltd.
* Sheraton House, Castle Park
* Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK
*--------------------------------------------------------------
* BUSTER Development Group (http://www.globalphasing.com)
***************************************************************
|