Dear Fernanda,
There was no attachment (as the list does not allow anything except very,
very small attachments) so I couldn't really be sure of what you are seeing.
Do your images start in very different alignments (i.e. 90 or 180 degrees
different)? If so then you might find that running fslreorient2std on your
data might help - do this on either the functional or the structural or both -
depending on which are in different orientations compared to the template
MNI152 images. You can also try "Full Search" if you have not tried that.
If you have fieldmaps then we strongly advise using those as they can
really help the functional to structural (example_func2highres) registration
hugely. Often these "failures" of registration relate to uncorrected distortion
in the functional EPI images.
All the best,
Mark
On 1 Sep 2011, at 14:46, Fernanda Palhano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I used FEAT GUI, first-level analysis to run the data, but I noticed a registration problem when I checked the registration report, the alignment (in red) didn't fit, please refer to the photos attached, the problem is quite clear according to the photos. The alignment for the images on the top seems fit the image on the bottom, and the alignment lines (red lines) for the images on the bottom seems fit the images on the top.
> I'm registering my functional image (EPI) to the MNI template. For this, I used a T1 structural image as Main structural image, 6 DOF, and MNI152_T1_2mm_brain, linear 12 DOF, as standard space.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Fernanda
|