JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  September 2011

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM September 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

The UK Higher Education System as Economic Roadkill

From:

Jonathan Cloke <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Jonathan Cloke <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:32:08 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

For a preview of the future of UK Higher Education under the ConDem coalition proposals, read below. 



O, also see this graph - http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/07/1014256/-Recent-college-graduates-face-long-lasting-economic-damage?via=blog_1



Economic Roadkill



CounterPunch, September 9, 2011



by MIKE WHITNEY



If you really want to know what¡¯s going on with the economy, you should take a look at the Fed¡¯s Consumer Credit Report that was released on Thursday. Yes, it¡¯s a real snoozer, but it does reveal the truth behind all the ¡°recovery¡± hype. So, let¡¯s cut to the chase: When unemployment is high and wages are stagnant, the only way the economy can grow is through credit expansion. That¡¯s why economists pay so much attention to the credit report, because it lets them see if we¡¯re making progress or not. Right now, we¡¯re not making any headway at all. Of course, the cheerleading media see things differently. Here¡¯s a clip from an article in Bloomberg that puts a positive spin on a truly dismal report:



    ¡°Credit increased $12 billion after a revised $11.3 billion rise in June, the Federal Reserve said today in Washington. Economists projected a $6 billion gain, according to the median forecast in a Bloomberg News survey. The rise in non-revolving loans was the most since November 2001.¡± (¡°U.S. Consumer Borrowing Rose by $12 Billion in July, Twice Amount Forecast¡±, Bloomberg)



Hooray!  The US consumer is off the canvas and borrowing again. Let the celebration begin!



Not so fast. The uptick in credit spending is entirely attributable to subprime auto loans and government-backed student loans, both of which are a mere extension of the same Ponzi-finance scam that put the global economy into cardiac arrest. Every other area of credit expansion is on-the-ropes. Commercial banks, finance companies, credit unions, savings institutions, nonfinancial businesses, and pools of securitized assets are all flatlining. No progress at all. In other words, the only way to induce tightfisted consumers to spend money they don¡¯t have is by either seducing them with ¡°No-down, easy-pay, 60-month-no-interest¡± financing or by hoodwinking them about the 6-figure income they¡¯ll net after they finish their college education at Lunkhead U.



Case in point; check out this article on subprime auto loans in Reuters:



    ¡°Lenders are making more subprime auto loans again, reversing the cautious approach they adopted after the credit crisis, an industry research firm said on Tuesday. The portion of car loans made to subprime borrowers rose to 40.8 percent in the second quarter from 37.2 percent a year earlier, according to Experian Automotive, a unit of credit bureau and research firm Experian Plc.



    The data shows how keen lenders are to boost their loan books amid a sluggish economy¡­.



    Average credit scores for borrowers declined and the average term for their loans extended by one month to 63 months on new cars and 59 months on used cars, according to Experian.



    ¡°We are continuing to see growth in subprime, both new and used, and loans are becoming looser,¡± Melinda Zabritski, director of automotive credit for Experian, said in an interview.



    Executives at Ally Financial said in May that subprime car lending had become ¡°very attractive¡± because profit margins on the loans more than cover the cost of expected losses from borrowers who fail to repay what they owe. Making the loans is part of Ally¡¯s strategy to grow by lending on more used cars¡­.



    Industry veterans have said that while the loans have been attractive recently, more lenders are entering the market and competing for business by lowering prices, a trend that could lead to higher losses in the future.¡± (¡°Lenders making more subprime car loans: report¡±, Reuters)



Bigger profits off lower credit scores. Now where have we heard that load of malarkey before?



Can you believe it? I mean, we haven¡¯t even paid for the last subprime meltdown, and we¡¯re on to the next? Do you think a little regulation might be a good idea here, like maybe some standardized loans so the banksters running these loan-laundering operations don¡¯t blow up the system again and come around begging for more bailouts?



Oh no, of course not. That would be an intrusion on the divine workings of the free market.



Bottom line: Yes, it is possible to boost credit if one is willing to lend gobs of money to anyone who can fog a mirror, but is that really an indication of ¡°economic recovery¡± or just more proof that the system is staggeringly out-of-whack?



And then there¡¯s the student loan biz, as big a fleecing operation as ever existed. This is where the real pros hang-out now, luring their prey with promises of hefty salaries after they graduate and then loading them up with enough debt to make their eyes pop out.   But, hey, let¡¯s not forget the upside of all this chicanery; all that fleecing beefs up the Fed¡¯s Credit Report and makes it look like the economy is bouncing back. That¡¯s got to be worth something, right? And, besides, everyone is ¡°doing it¡±; fleecing college kids, that is. Here¡¯s an excerpt from an article in The Atlantic:



    ¡°How do colleges manage it? Kenyon has erected a $70 million sports palace featuring a 20-lane olympic pool. Stanford¡¯s professors now get paid sabbaticals every fourth year, handing them $115,000 for not teaching. Vanderbilt pays its president $2.4 million. Alumni gifts and endowment earnings help with the costs. But a major source is tuition payments, which at private schools are breaking the $40,000 barrier, more than many families earn. Sadly, there¡¯s more to the story. Most students have to take out loans to remit what colleges demand. At colleges lacking rich endowments, budgeting is based on turning a generation of young people into debtors.



    As this semester begins, college loans are nearing the $1 trillion mark, more than what all households owe on their credit cards. Fully two-thirds of our undergraduates have gone into debt, many from middle class families, who in the past paid for much of college from savings. The College Board likes to say that the average debt is ¡°only¡± $27,650. What the Board doesn¡¯t say is that when personal circumstances go wrong, as can happen in a recession, interest, late payment penalties, and other charges can bring the tab up to $100,000. Those going on to graduate school, as upwards of half will, can end up facing twice that.¡±  (¡°The Debt Crisis at American Colleges,¡± The Atlantic)



Do you think these pillars of rectitude would ever dream of warning our kids that they might they might be getting in-over-their-heads, that they might want to reconsider what they¡¯re doing so they don¡¯t spend the rest of their lives trying to get out of the red?



Nah. It¡¯s not my problem, they figure. Besides why rock the boat. If these kids ever figure out that they just flushed $100,000 down the latrine for a mid-level management job at Herfy¡¯s that pays $22K per year with no-time-off, they might just go ape and torch our lovely new sports pavilion. We can¡¯t have that, now can we?



Here¡¯s more from another article in The Atlantic:



    ¡°Student loan debt has grown by 511% over this period. In the first quarter of 1999, just $90 billion in student loans were outstanding. As of the second quarter of 2011, that balance had ballooned to $550 billion.



    How does the housing bubble debt compare? If you add together mortgages and revolving home equity, then from the first quarter of 1999 to when housing-related debt peaked in the third quarter of 2008, the sum increased from $3.28 trillion to $9.98 trillion. Over this period, housing-related debt had increased threefold. Meanwhile, over the entire period shown on the chart, the balance of student loans grew by more than 6x. The growth of student loans has been twice as steep ¡ª and it¡¯s showing no signs of slowing.



    Obviously the number of students didn¡¯t grow by 511%. So why are education loans growing so rapidly? One reason could be availability. The government¡¯s backing lets credit to students flow very freely. And as the article from yesterday noted, universities are raising tuition aggressively since students are willing to pay more through those loans.



    All this college debt could put the U.S. on a slower growth path in the years to come. As Americans grapple with high student loan payments for the first few decades of their adult lives, they¡¯ll have less money to spend and invest. All that money flowing into colleges and universities is being funneled away from other industries where it would have been spent in future years. Of course, this would be a rather unfortunate irony: higher education is supposed to enhance a nation¡¯s growth, but with such an enormous debt burden, graduates might not be able to spend and invest enough to allow that growth to occur.¡± (¡°Chart of the Day: Student Loans Have Grown 511% Since 1999¡å, The Atlantic)



Anyway, you get the picture. Young people are just the latest subset of victims in Big Capital¡¯s endless search for roadkill. No sense getting all huffy about it. But it does help to shed a little light on underlying condition of the economy vis a vis the Fed¡¯s Credit Report.



Indeed, credit is expanding, but only in the areas where the sinister lifting of consumer protections (deregulation) has allowed finance vultures to do their dirtywork. As for the economy, it still stinks. But, then, you already knew that.





Dr Jon Cloke

Lecturer/Research Associate

Geography Department

Loughborough University

Loughborough LE11 3TU



Office: 01509 228193

Mob: 07984 813681

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager