On the surface it doesn't seem as bad as others, i.e., it does not
seem to be a real fake--perhaps just a strong form of wishful thinking
and creative density interpretation. I wonder what would be a good
metric in which to establish a cutoff for present/not present in
density. CC, maybe?
Jacob
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:01 PM, David Schuller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Time to fuel up the gossip engines for the approaching weekend:
>
>
> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096921260800186X
>
> RETRACTED: Structure of the Parathyroid Hormone Receptor C Terminus Bound to
> the G-Protein Dimer Gβ1γ2
> Structure, Volume 16, Issue 7, 9 July 2008, Pages 1086-1094
> Structure 2QNS withdrawn.
>
> --
> =======================================================================
> All Things Serve the Beam
> =======================================================================
> David J. Schuller
> modern man in a post-modern world
> MacCHESS, Cornell University
> [log in to unmask]
>
--
*******************************************
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: [log in to unmask]
*******************************************
|