[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]>: > Well this article seems to have been refereed to 11 times so presumably these 11 publications also have to be retracted. I haven't checked the number of citations for each of the 11 publications but articles citing these will also be in doubt. And then ...... > > It reminds me somewhat of the Erdos number calculation. How many [...][log in to unmask] |