I was missing the semicolon, but it still fails
On 12 Aug 2011, at 10:12, Antony Oliver wrote:
> Interesting iPhone formatting things going on... Let's try again...
>
> First line is "greater than symbol" > followed by some text about your protein then closed with a semicolon. The next line is blank. The next line contains your amino acid sequence, which you can also close with an optional asterisk.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 12 Aug 2011, at 10:06, "Antony Oliver" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> PIR is fairly similar to Fasta, from addled memory the format is...
>>
>>> protein name;
>> ----empty line----
>> MPREIL...rest of amino acid sequence with an optional asterisk to mark the sequence end.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 12 Aug 2011, at 09:14, "Phil Evans" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone get this server to work? For me it keeps complaining that my sequence file is not a PIR file. The file looks OK to me, but I've never really understood what a PIR file is
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>> On 12 Aug 2011, at 01:39, Kevin Jin wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should we really have some crystallographers to review and qc those structures before the formal releasing? JCSG has set a very good mechanism for this issue.
>>>>
>>>> There is a sever for self check.
>>>>
>>>> http://smb.slac.stanford.edu/jcsg/QC/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> I think they fudged the data in this paper...
>>>>
>>>> JPK
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:30 PM, David Schuller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>> link: http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/IAI.05661-11v1
>>>>>
>>>>> Ferric C. Fang & Arturo Casadevall
>>>>> Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
>>>>> Infec. Immun. doi:10.1128/IAI.05661-11
>>>>>
>>>>> Abstract: Articles may be retracted when their findings are no longer
>>>>> considered trustworthy due to scientific misconduct or error, they
>>>>> plagiarize previously published work, or are found to violate ethical
>>>>> guidelines. Using a novel measure that we call the “retraction index,” we
>>>>> found that the frequency of retraction varies among journals and shows a
>>>>> strong correlation with the journal impact factor.
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> (with special attention to Figure 1, Retraction Index vs. Impact Factor)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> =======================================================================
>>>>> All Things Serve the Beam
>>>>> =======================================================================
>>>>> David J. Schuller
>>>>> modern man in a post-modern world
>>>>> MacCHESS, Cornell University
>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *******************************************
>>>> Jacob Pearson Keller
>>>> Northwestern University
>>>> Medical Scientist Training Program
>>>> cel: 773.608.9185
>>>> email: [log in to unmask]
>>>> *******************************************
>>>>
|